
Muncie
Members-
Posts
1,202 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by Muncie
-
The slicks in the kit are very close - Monogram made the slicks wider for the funny cars and prostocks in the '80's - Competition Resins CRT-510 are the same width as the slicks in the earlier dragsters and have sidewall detail.
-
one idea that I heard long ago - ShooGoo - an adhesive for gluing shoe soles back together. I used ShooGoo on some of the old Revell two piece slicks and it's probably stuck stronger than material that the tires are made out of. Kind of give it a light coat to stick the halves together, then add more in layers inside the tire when it dries to reinforce the seam. Tough stuff but easy to sand off the tread where you don't want it. Didn't leave a noticeable seam. It's pretty easily available where they sell shoe polish or in the adhesive department at the hardware store. Works good on shoes, too.
-
Check out Southern Motorsports and Hobbies - the Coronet body that I ordered from SMH was in stock and in my hands in less than two weeks. They offer a 1963 Ford Galaxy "boxtop" (sorry, I'm not Ford guy so don't know if "boxtop and "notch roof" are the same thing)
-
Probably depends on the year of competition- the NHRA rulebook changes... Here's a line from the 1967 Rule book - from the of the gasser section - Bodies: Gas Coupes/Sedans --- " ... Full-fendered steel-bodied roadsters and convertible coupes/sedans may compete in this division without top but must have a roll bar..." The rule book also has body requirements for Modified Sports Cars and Street Roadsters so those classes were also current that year kind of dry reading, but hope it helps
-
Have to agree... great products, well cast, quick delivery, and great customer service Scott is also very helpful with questions about his products.
-
Wow, I'm looking forward to this! A couple of alphabets in good gasser font styles with a pinstrip outline would be great for "could have been" gasser models. Gold leaf would be a bonus for sure. Model rairoad decal alphabets don't have the right look. Most '60's gassers had just the names of the owner or team lettered on the door with transmission, camshaft, and fiberglass sponsors spelled out on the hood and quarter panel. The gasser books above are a good resource for photos. Hope this helps
-
Perry's business probably does OK - it's difficult to beat 100% profit... In July 2010, I called to ask about the availability and lead time for a 1965 Coronet body - In the back of my mind, I was already planning to cut my losses and order just one. But he told me no problem, several in stock because he was getting ready for a show. So I rushed to the post office and sent a money order for two. Got nothing... Called and wrote a couple of times - always had a story. One time Randy told me that the fire department had shut down his casting operation at home - too many chemicals. Another time he told me he couldn't cast at the shop because customers needed attention. Told me he sent it, told me he would send it, told me he couldn't find the order, told me he found the order, told me he would send it again... Last time I called he even said he would send some extra goodies for my trouble. I followed up with an inquiry to the post office and he did receive the money order. I’ve received nothing. One of those guys that make you really appreciate the good resin casters.
-
Why did COE trucks go out of favor?
Muncie replied to oldscool's topic in General Automotive Talk (Trucks and Cars)
The Surface Transportation Assistance Act of about 1982 changed the market almost overnight. Prior to the STAA, state regulations limited the overall length of the combination tractor and trailer - shorter cab equals more trailer. New federal regulations went into effect for vehicles operated on Interstate Highways, connecting roads, and roads built with federal money - the STAA requirements only restricted the lengh of the trailer. Of course there were many other details and exceptions in the regulations. It instantly made the conventional more popular when the length of the tractor was no longer a factor in the size and weight requirements. yeah, that's kind of dry, but it's late and it takes at least two cups of coffee to get through the regulations... -
Stripping "Satin" chrome
Muncie replied to BKcustoms's topic in Model Building Questions and Answers
If this is an older kit with the 1980's Monogram dull chrome, a dip in brake fluid for 5 minutes will remove the dull and leave the bright chrome underneath. Overnight will remove all of the chrome. Experiment on a a couple of pieces of sprue. gloves to protect your hands and good safety precautions with this stuff -
Southern Motorsports
Muncie replied to Big Daddy's topic in General Automotive Talk (Trucks and Cars)
I have to join this party. Great Service - Every order has arrived just as quick as he said it would. Heavy into NASCAR and decals - has some things that you won't see anyplace else. It's fun just cruising his web site. And if you're in Charlotte or Mooresville, it's a pretty drive through that part of North Carolina to the store. -
Help converting a '55 Nomad to a Sedan Delivery
Muncie replied to RT6PK's topic in Model Building Questions and Answers
Go for it - I have the Modelhaus 1956 Chevrolet sedan delivery kit for the Monogram '56 Nomad and it is very good - like everything from Modelhaus. It's a good piece with seats, interior panels, cargo floor, and hub caps. Wouldn't expect anything different from them for a '55 sedan delivery. I have a '56 2-door wagon resin body from somewhere else with the lower roof - not as good. oops - sorry, posting at the same time again... -
Help converting a '55 Nomad to a Sedan Delivery
Muncie replied to RT6PK's topic in Model Building Questions and Answers
An interesting and challenging project... Although the Nomad and sedan delivery chassis are the same, there is a substantial difference in the body. The Nomad roof and tailgate are cosiderably different with the Nomad's shorter roof and more fastback slope to the tailgate. The Nomad roof is also two inches lower than the sedan delivery and wagon roof. It may almost be easier to start with the '55 sedan than the Nomad because that will give you the correct roof/windshiled height with everything from the back of the doors forward and the rear quarter panels. Starting with the Nomad gives a headstart on sedan delivery with a two inch chop so it's not a bad plan either. I've seen a couple of AMT Nomads buit with the windows glued in and painted - makes a cool phantom Nomad delivery. (edit) oops, posting at the same time - the picures tell the story... -
Freightliner FLA question
Muncie replied to truckabilly's topic in WIP: Model Trucks: Big Rigs and Heavy Equipment
Leo, good observation. Take a Freightliner COE - make the tunnel narrower and about 2" high, add a cowl and hood - presto Freightliner FLC conventional cab. It's amazing how many parts are common between the COE and conventional. Tim, you are also correct. More info... Freightliner offered two COE cab series in the 70's. The "raised" 61 Series cab model was offered in the early 1970's and was discontinued in the early 80's - it can be identified by the single vertical bar in the center of the grille. The AMT kit represents a 61 Series cab at 90.38" wide. As available horsepower increased above 350, the size of the engine tunnel limited space for the larger radiators and cooling packages that were required. The 71 Series Stretch cab was introduced in the mid 1970's with the Super Cooling Power Package. The 71 Series had a 4" wider engine tunnel making the Stretch cab 94.38" wide. Stretch cabs can be quickly identified by the two vertical bars in a stamped sheetmetal grille. The FLA replaced the 71 Series and carried over the basic cab dimensions of the Stretch cab. So - 61 Series - 90.38" wide and 71 Series cabs - 94.38" wide. These dimensions are from the Freightliner Sales Data Book - I suppose 96" looks better in a sales brochure. The Powerliner was also 94.38" wide, but had a different cooling package and was a very different vehicle. That's about as good as my memory is. Just measured an AMT cab - 3.57" or 1/25 scale 89.25 " get the cab stretcher! -
Freightliner FLA question
Muncie replied to truckabilly's topic in WIP: Model Trucks: Big Rigs and Heavy Equipment
Truckabilly, The nominal cab width of a Freightliner FLA is 94.38" excluding the lights, mirrors and grabhandles. The AMT White-Freightliner COE kit represents an early 1970's cab which was 90.38" - unfortunately this difference in width is noticeable in the width of the grille and in the front wheelwells around the tires. Freghtliner also made other changes to the COE cabs between the early 1970's and the FLA in the late 1980's. We're talking 15 to 20 years of evolution, enhancements, and new design. Changes include the doors, cab structure, cab steps, dash, shifter, heater/air conditioner, grille, and one-piece windshield opening - as well as chassis, supension, front brakes and crossmember changes (plus many that I've missed). The Italeri conventional would give you some of the pieces that were common between the FLA COE and the FLD conventional. A conversion would be a challenging but interesting project. Hope this helps -
www.wallesdator.com - click on the Foose oval
-
Not feeling so great that this is my first post... would have liked the subject to be something better. Sent an order to Time Machine Resins for a ‘65 Coronet in December 2009 and still waiting… At first, I lost the paperwork so I couldn’t follow up on it. Sent a letter when I found the paperwork in March 2011 and Jeff called me back. One problem, enough time had passed that he couldn’t verify whether he sent it or not but if I would split the cost of a replacement… somewhat agreed with what he said and sent more money. He mentioned some family things were taking his time. In October 2011, still no Coronet - called again. Exchanged emails in April 2012 and Jeff said OK to a refund. Never got it. I can cut somebody some slack when life happens - but when it starts looking like someone takes money for orders that they never intend to send, that’s something different. UPDATE - 11/18/2014 Received my 3 year old order today - good to see Jeff is getting these taken care of - no issues with the quality of the product