Thanks Chuck, but I was stating I agreed with Ed and Plumber. I hadn't noticed that it had gone to two pages before I posted.
Frankly, I don't understand what all the fuss is about with "compromises" in 2/3-in-1 kits. Let's be honest for a moment. Real cars always have compromises; if these are represented in your model, isn't that executing scale fidelity? Most of us also have deep enough parts boxes to be able to correct deficiencies, real or perceived, with minimal difficulty. Those of you who like to cut, chop, carve, and otherwise torture pieces of high-impact polystyrene into arcane forms can do so to your heart's content, but let those of us who prefer original to have our fun, too.
Remember, the real customizers and rodders start with factory stock as well.
Unchopping a roof is next to impossible; I've been looking at that car for hours and I can't figure out how to do it at the sail panels and rear window, and still have it look good when it's done.
Ed's idea of supplying a chopped roof pre-molded like the '53 Studebaker seems to be a good example of a reasonable compromise. Worst case, the rest of the parts can come from a convertible for a stock chassis. That doesn't bother me if I have to use say 90% of one kit to make what's basically a part-swap conversion.
I suppose I should be ready to be jumped on again, but thanks for the attempt to defend me, anyway.
Charlie Larkin