Harry P. Posted March 22, 2016 Posted March 22, 2016 This is the Minicraft kit of the Trevithick "Pen-y-Darren" steam locomotive from 1804. Englishman/engineer/inventor Richard Trevithick had already built large stationary steam-powered engines for factory and mill use... this was his first "mobile" steam engine, and the world's first successful steam locomotive. The model is very small... it's 1/38 scale ... the whole thing, both locomotive and coal car combined, is only about eight inches long. All the paint is acrylic craft paint, which I "grimed up" with black washes. I added real wood on the floor of the coal car. This is definitely a "different" model!
cobraman Posted March 22, 2016 Posted March 22, 2016 I like different stuff and this sure fits the bill. Great work. Strange gear set up on that thing. 2 wheel drive on the same side ?
Harry P. Posted March 22, 2016 Author Posted March 22, 2016 I guess by gearing both wheels there's less stress on the drive wheels than if only one was geared, and you reduce the chances of breaking a gear tooth? Just a wild guess.Remember, this was 1804... engineering back then wasn't what it is today.
Danno Posted March 22, 2016 Posted March 22, 2016 That's definitely different! Nice bui . . . job, Harry.
Harry P. Posted March 22, 2016 Author Posted March 22, 2016 That's definitely different! Nice bui . . . job, Harry. Ah, I see what you did there...
TomZ Posted March 22, 2016 Posted March 22, 2016 Solid axles, so it's four wheel drive.I built one of those. Not nearly as nice as yours, but a lot of fun since it's so weird.thanks for sharing.
Harry P. Posted March 22, 2016 Author Posted March 22, 2016 I like different stuff and this sure fits the bill. Great work. Strange gear set up on that thing. 2 wheel drive on the same side ? Maybe Bill Engwer will see this and weigh in. He's pretty well versed in engineering... he might have some insight as to why this thing was geared the way it was.
CometMan Posted March 22, 2016 Posted March 22, 2016 Yet another very cool and unusual subject from you Harry!
Harry P. Posted March 22, 2016 Author Posted March 22, 2016 Yet another very cool and unusual subject from you Harry! Thanks, Craig! I specialize in weird subjects...
CometMan Posted March 22, 2016 Posted March 22, 2016 Thanks, Craig! I specialize in weird subjects... I wouldn't say weird Harry, I have been a member at Henry Ford Museum/Greenfield Village for over 20 years, I get to see 1:1 stuff like that whenever I want, I love it!
Ramfins59 Posted March 23, 2016 Posted March 23, 2016 Yet another fine example of model building from your bench Harry.
Crazy Ed Posted March 23, 2016 Posted March 23, 2016 That Thing looks Wonderful Harry. But it sure would be a bear to feed it in operation! Shovel out of the Coal Box then pretty much crawl under the Drive Mechanism with that "Connecting Rod" moving back and forth overhead. No matter WHAT happens, Do Not Stand UP!
Ridge Rider Posted March 23, 2016 Posted March 23, 2016 You sure build some beautiful models Harry and this this another fine example. Thanks for sharing.
JTalmage Posted March 23, 2016 Posted March 23, 2016 (edited) That is neat. I like it a lot. I see things like this at an antique machinery show that happens near me every late summer/fall in Georgetown, Ohio called the Ohio Valley Antique Machinery show. I'm not in to tractors and farm stuff myself, but I go there because it's amazing all of the old machines that are still working, and the engineering of those days is very intriguing to me. Also, could you imagine the size of that flywheel in real life?? wow! Edited March 23, 2016 by JTalmage
gtx6970 Posted March 23, 2016 Posted March 23, 2016 Thanks, Craig! I specialize in weird subjects... Thats an understatement. You do pieces that I never even knew existed in real life ,let alone model form And Different is good. Either way , your diversity has made me consider stepping outside my usual subjects sometime because of it . I have some 20's and early 30s cars that may come to the front of the line sooner than originally planned . My dad is a retired rail road engineer . And I have considered building some sort of locomotive for him . Might have to seriously consider it sooner than later.
Harry P. Posted March 23, 2016 Author Posted March 23, 2016 That Thing looks Wonderful Harry. But it sure would be a bear to feed it in operation! Shovel out of the Coal Box then pretty much crawl under the Drive Mechanism with that "Connecting Rod" moving back and forth overhead. No matter WHAT happens, Do Not Stand UP! Yeah, ergonomics wasn't really factored into the design...
Harry P. Posted March 23, 2016 Author Posted March 23, 2016 Did you guys notice that at the time this thing was built, the wheels weren't flanged like on trains today, but the rails were flanged!
Sixties Sam Posted March 23, 2016 Posted March 23, 2016 (edited) Wow, very cool model, Harry! It's a real history lesson in miniature. Great job on the build!Sam Edited March 23, 2016 by Sixties Sam
TomZ Posted March 23, 2016 Posted March 23, 2016 There is a youtube video or two of this thing in operation. Either it or a reproduction still exists.
Harry P. Posted March 23, 2016 Author Posted March 23, 2016 There is a youtube video or two of this thing in operation. Either it or a reproduction still exists.Has to be a reproduction, the real thing is long gone.
Ace-Garageguy Posted March 24, 2016 Posted March 24, 2016 Maybe Bill Engwer will see this and weigh in. He's pretty well versed in engineering... he might have some insight as to why this thing was geared the way it was. COOL model! Love it, gotta get one. I'm sure your premise that "by gearing both wheels there's less stress on the drive wheels than if only one was geared, and you reduce the chances of breaking a gear tooth" is correct, and that 4 wheels driving would give superior traction on slippery metal rails than only two. All these parts would have been cast-iron, and though iron is 'strong', it's somewhat brittle. It wasn't until the mid 1800s that the Bessemer process ushered in the age of industrial steel. Cast-iron's brittleness would surely have been a factor in designing those gears to try to avoid breaking.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now