Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

would using a amt 51 Chevy for the stock roof and maybe the interior, make it a more mild custom Caddy?

Posted (edited)

would using a amt 51 Chevy for the stock roof and maybe the interior, make it a more mild custom Caddy?

could be a starting point.  I'm thinking about grafting a 51 Bel Air ht roof on to make a custom Coupe de Ville.  

Edited by Rob Hall
Posted

Since the caddy is a 49 and revell wouldn't the revell  50 Olds supply alot of things such as roof,interior, chassis ect to make a close to stock cadillac???

Posted

Since the caddy is a 49 and revell wouldn't the revell  50 Olds supply alot of things such as roof,interior, chassis ect to make a close to stock cadillac???

The '48-49 Cadillac wasn't available with a roofline like the Olds 88 coupe.   However, the AMT '51 Bel Air ht roof is similar to a Coupe de Ville, and the '51 Chevy Fleetline fastback roofline is similar to a '48-49 Cadillac Club Coupe sedanette...

49 cadillac series sixty-two coupe deville.jpg

14676484941_a11e4cd343_b.jpg

Posted (edited)

well then the roof from a 51 chevy, interior and chassis from the 50 olds ???

Edited by ranma
Posted (edited)

well then the roof from a 51 chevy, interior and chassis from the 50 olds ???

I don't know how much similarity the chassis or interior would have, but the Olds 88 had a wheelbase 6.5 inches shorter than the Cadillac... 

Edited by Rob Hall
Posted (edited)

I got mine yesterday, yay. Anybody else get the folded A pillars?, boo. I predict a bit of packaging will be added to support those A pillars as soon as they get tired of mailing replacement bodies.

Edited by samdiego
Posted

The '48-49 Cadillac wasn't available with a roofline like the Olds 88 coupe.   However, the AMT '51 Bel Air ht roof is similar to a Coupe de Ville, and the '51 Chevy Fleetline fastback roofline is similar to a '48-49 Cadillac Club Coupe sedanette...

49 cadillac series sixty-two coupe deville.jpg

14676484941_a11e4cd343_b.jpg

Didn't model haus make a sedanette?  BTW, who is buying all of model haus molds.?

Posted

Didn't model haus make a sedanette?  BTW, who is buying all of model haus molds.?

They did.  No one is buying their tooling AFAIK, or at least nothing has been announced. 

Posted

 No one is buying their tooling AFAIK, or at least nothing has been announced. 

   But I sure wish someone talented would do just that!!

There are still some real good resin casters around, so we can

just be hopeful, maybe!?!

    David S.

P.S.- I want at least 2 of these myself.

Posted

I have to say, I like the stock Caddy a lot. The Foose version does nothing for me. Never saw a Foose crapation that I liked in fact.

Posted

:angry:I just got my two kits the kit's are really great but both had the wind shield post bent all the way back do to piss poor packing !!!! Has anyone got in touch with revel about replacement body's yet.

Posted

:angry:I just got my two kits the kit's are really great but both had the wind shield post bent all the way back do to piss poor packing !!!! Has anyone got in touch with revel about replacement body's yet.

Yup,  I e-mailed my request Monday. They e-mailed me to say I had to send the actual barcode cut from the boxtop. 4-6 weeks wait.

Posted

Yup,  I e-mailed my request Monday. They e-mailed me to say I had to send the actual barcode cut from the boxtop. 4-6 weeks wait.

Hi thanks I will do it for one of the kits but the other I am going to put a full roof on it so it does not make a deference on that one I guess with a 4 to 6 week wait I will start on the roof one first .!!!!

Posted

This is nuts! They could have taken some precautions to avoid damage to the posts.
I don't have the kit, so I am presuming there is no special packing? No molded in frame support to be removed by the builder?
So I am supposed to buy the kit, on faith that the framing is OK?
I hope the next itineration of this car is the hardtop. If it was Moebius, probably. But, with Revell, doubtful.

Posted

No support of any kind. My body was on its side with the A-pillars facing the rest of the parts

Mine was the same except the pillars faced the outside of the box.  It's like they tossed it in as an afterthought.

Posted

Mine was the same except the pillars faced the outside of the box.  It's like they tossed it in as an afterthought.

Mine was like that, luckily nothing bent.  They should have had a cardboard support wedged under the windshield frame (as I've seen with other convertible kits) or removable molded-in ones on the sides.. 

Posted

I got mine yesterday, yay. Anybody else get the folded A pillars?, boo. I predict a bit of packaging will be added to support those A pillars as soon as they get tired of mailing replacement bodies.

No support of any kind. My body was on its side with the A-pillars facing the rest of the parts

This is nuts! They could have taken some precautions to avoid damage to the posts.
I don't have the kit, so I am presuming there is
no special packing? No molded in frame support to be removed by the builder?
So I am supposed to buy the kit, on faith that the framing is OK?
I hope the next itineration of this car is the hardtop. If it was Moebius, probably. But, with Revell, doubtful.

I Agree ....!  This is crazy  .....   How long have we been doing this??   Nobody at Revell thought this would be an Issue...?   

I am very disappointed in Revell's product developement and (Quality Controll) ???

Scheeeese....!20170806_071628.thumb.jpg.ae33afe78901a220170806_071805.thumb.jpg.3691e4c9949012

Posted

Just within the last year, between the warped Ramcharger bodies, incorrect Black Widow kits (Bel Air side trim instead of 150), and this, it's proof that there's really no serious attempt from Revell HQ as far as quality control.

Seems like they pretty much give the production go-ahead to whatever facilities are molding and packaging the kits, then just sit back and not worry about anything until buyers start discovering the problems.  From the postings so far on this one, it's pretty obvious that this is a widespread problem that could have been discovered easily if they randomly sampled a certain amount of kits.

Posted

 

 

I Agree ....!  This is crazy  .....   How long have we been doing this??   Nobody at Revell thought this would be an Issue...?   

I am very disappointed in Revell's product developement and (Quality Controll) ???

Scheeeese....!20170806_071628.thumb.jpg.ae33afe78901a220170806_071805.thumb.jpg.3691e4c9949012

The body in my kit was at the bottom of the box with the other items all on top of it.  Mine looked like the one pictured, except the header was split down the center.  The passenger side was bent down as pictured, the driver side was still in the correct position.  I was able to get it straight, so I won't bother asking for a replacement.  They should watch this when packing the kits, though. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...