Preferences

[Donny]

3 minutes ago, Ace-Garageguy said:

But wait...there's more...

    

I'll have to go change my shirt, mate, I'm drooling. 😁

[Jim B]

This is kind of an open-ended question, as you've probably seen.  Ask 40 different people and get 40 different answers.  I guess it really boils down to the person's approach to modeling.  For me, I build to relax & enjoy my time at the bench, so I prefer kits the fit well.  Minor fit issues I can understand & deal with (minor flash, mold lines, etc.), but I do not want to have to fight to get a kit to fit.  This to me is frustrating & not enjoyable.  AMT, MPC, and in some cases, Revell kits generally fit into this category, mostly due to the age of the molds.  Tamiya kits fit well, although they can be a little fiddly at times.  Many of the Revell kits fit well, and the Italeri kits I've built have fit ok.  The one Moebius kit I built fit well, although the instructions were difficult to interpret. I cannot speak to Fujimi, Hasagawa, NuNu, or SalvinosJR as I have not built any of their kits yet.  Don't get me wrong.  I have seen some fantastic builds from AMT & MPC kits, and I have built several of their kits; however, for the frustration they usually bring, I don't think they are worth the $40-45 (maybe $25).

[1930fordpickup]

 As Ace as already ask or even PM someone. When a kit is made has a lot to do with the quality and look. There is an on line sourse that has decent info but not always 100 % accurate. Scalemates check there also. 

[Dragline]

I was a Monogram Zombie as a kid. Revell next, then AMT/MPC.

These days it's whatever blows my skirt up. 

[sidcharles]

Revell as a pat, one word, answer.

but there are satellite companies already mentioned which have a fairly short list but they are exquisite kits. i think the current lingo is "artisanal" - at least that's what the local bakery calls their $10 a loaf bread.

the lady who makes it doesn't shave her legs, but that's another thread unto itself.

[Can-Con]

23 minutes ago, sidcharles said:

Revell as a pat, one word, answer.

 

Never built a car kit Revell tooled up in the late '70s early '80s have ya? 😁

EVERY model company has good and bad kits. 

[sidcharles]

15 minutes ago, Can-Con said:

Never built a car kit Revell tooled up in the late '70s early '80s have ya? 😁

EVERY model company has good and bad kits. 

you transport me back and i'll build that puppy; let's go.

Revell kits were way to hard for me as a kid. my list of failures include the original Mickey Thompson  Challenger 

 

and the 1956 Ford pickup

oh, wait; you mentioned '70s & '80s. nope sorry; those were model train decades.

 

[Can-Con]

11 minutes ago, sidcharles said:

you transport me back and i'll build that puppy; let's go.

Revell kits were way to hard for me as a kid. my list of failures include the original Mickey Thompson  Challenger 

 

and the 1956 Ford pickup

oh, wait; you mentioned '70s & '80s. nope sorry; those were model train decades.

 

Here's the instructions from the Revell Mustang LL kit. Originally from the late '70s. BTW, the first 15 illustrations could be directly from their Chevy Monza and/or Pontiac Sunbird with no alterations as they were exactly the same parts except for the wheel outers.

[sidcharles]

you read instructions?

i thought they were simply suggested sequences.