Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

That is why the side-post battery was invented, so that the old style top-post batteries wouldn't short against the hoods during shipping.

Posted

I read that they shipped them vertically due to wheel bearing issues. The train would cross 10's of thousands of railroad track seams during the shipping and it would cause damage to the wheel bearings, as they were supposed to take stress under load while rotating. This eliminated that issue. Not sure if that's true or not.

Posted

According to the article, all fluids were present. Fascinating, I never knew this.

Posted

I read that they shipped them vertically due to wheel bearing issues. The train would cross 10's of thousands of railroad track seams during the shipping and it would cause damage to the wheel bearings, as they were supposed to take stress under load while rotating. This eliminated that issue. Not sure if that's true or not.

No, The Vertipak boxcar concept was meant to get more Vega's onto freight cars than was possible with the 85' Trilevel Autoracks then in use. It wasn't very successful, as railroads and even TTX were at best lukewarm to the concept and not being willing to lay out tons of money for such a new concept. The other flaw was simply that the fluids in the engine tended to get into places where they should not be.

Art

Posted

It seems like the expense of purpose built boxcars, and the extra hassle & time of loading and unloading would outweight the "savings". Also seems like a high risk for catastrophy.

Posted

The batteries had the caps all the way to the back end of the top so the battery acid wouldn't flow out. I remember seeing those when I worked at a few gas stations in the 70s - back when they had attendants and there was no self-serve. Sort of like New Jersey today.

Posted

They should have let some of the oily stuff leak a bit. It might have slowed down the rust….. :rolleyes:

Last summer I went to a show at Belmont Park and there was a beautiful, intact, and FUNCTIONING Vega in attendance. Stone stock. Had a crowd around it all day...

Posted (edited)

I wonder if they do any cars like that presently...?

I believe that the Vert-A-Pac program that GM and the railroad(s) developed did not survive the Vega. Here in Lafayette, which is the home of Subaru Indiana Automotive, and on one of the major railroad mainlines servicing several auto plants, we can see as many as a thousand automobile-hauling freight cars on any given day--and NONE of them are this type of cars (at least I've not seen any of those in almost 40 years).

According to Wikipedia, only 452 Vert-A-Pac cars were produced--all conversions of 85' piggyback flatcars in 1971-73, and all were withdrawn from service in 1977, and were refitted with conventional tri-level decking.

Art

Edited by Art Anderson
Posted

Besides, the Vegas got dizzy from standing on their heads so long.

Maybe this is why they also fell apart on the showroom floor... ;-)

Seriously, it would seem that this sort of transport position might put undue stress on a unibody.

IIRC, Chrysler designed their "K" car at a certain length so they could squeeze more onto a standard railcar.

Posted

The Nov 2013 issue of Trains magazine (Kalmbach publishing) had a series of great articles on auto transportation via railroads, one of which was on the Verta-Pac Vega autoracks. A good read.

Yeah, I'm a railfan and model railroader, too.

Posted

Not unlike buying a 1:1 Vega.

THANK YOU, GOOD NIGHT....

Besides the fact they quit making Vegas like 5 years before you were even born........

So by the time you would have been legal to drive they would have been at least 21 years old by then. :blink:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...