[quote name='gasser59' timestamp='1353213666' post='818704']
I likes this one very much. I have one on my to-do list but with the 289. So tell me more about the better '67 chassis vs. the '66. If its that much better, I'll follow your lead.
the 66 chassis is very generic...no shock towers , molded in detail that you would like to have separate drive train is much more accurate, and if your planning on doing a 289 car the engine from the 67 is much nicer in all aspects then the 66's... you will have to graft the engine bay from the 67 onto the 66's body, it is almost a direct fit with a little sheet styrene and some minor trimming ... i removed the center drive shaft hump from the 66 interior and trimmed it to fit over the 67's trans tunnel...
[quote name='crazyjim' timestamp='1353192232' post='818518']
X 3. How did you do the trunk? I like the SHINY
scale motorsports decals were used as the floor mat and to cover the spare tire cover that i believe comes in the 66 kit
[quote name='slusher' timestamp='1353198279' post='818570']
Beautiful Mustang, amazing detail... Where did you get the ford 6cyl?
The six is from Bandit resins and converted from his 170ci six and the trans is from MAD with modifications to make it have the High mount starter position, The Mad trans comes withe the later low mount starter position
Thanx guys for all your feeback