Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

How about a laugh?

Ace-Garageguy

By Ace-Garageguy
in The Off-Topic Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Ace-Garageguy MCM Ohana

Ace-Garageguy

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, oldnslow said:

314016318_5594862207227517_4843443518873

Funny and true, but minus 10 points for incorrect apostrophe usage on "airbag's".

How hard is it, really, to remember you don't use a damm apostrophe before an "s" signifying plural (more than one)?

Edited by Ace-Garageguy
TYPO
  • Like 1
stitchdup MCM Ohana

stitchdup

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, Ace-Garageguy said:

Funny and true, but minus 10 points for incorrect apostrophe usage on "airbag's".

How hard is it, really, to remember you don't use a damm apostrophe before an "s" signifying plural (more than one)?

but it could be correct, apostrophe s also means belongs to, as in possesed by so they could be saying it doesn't own airbags.

Ace-Garageguy MCM Ohana

Ace-Garageguy

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, stitchdup said:

but it could be correct, apostrophe s also means belongs to, as in possesed by so they could be saying it doesn't own airbags.

Wrong. "Airbag's" means owned BY an airbag.

Edited by Ace-Garageguy
TYPO
  • Like 1
Rob Hall MCM Ohana

Rob Hall

Posted
Posted (edited)
57 minutes ago, Ace-Garageguy said:

Wrong. "Airbag's" means owned BY an airbag.

And if owned by multiple airbags, it would be "airbags' ".   Not "airbag's' " .
 

Edited by Rob Hall
  • Like 2
NOBLNG MCM Ohana

NOBLNG

Posted
Posted (edited)

The apostrophe contraction only takes the place of the i in “is”. Try saying these with “is” in place of the “ ‘s”. If it doesn’t sound correct, it’s not.  Airbags’ WOULD mean owned by an airbag.
No airbag’s foolproof. (correct)

No airbag’s or seatbelts. (Incorrect)

This is the old airbags’ house. (Correct…I think)

 

Edited by NOBLNG
Ace-Garageguy MCM Ohana

Ace-Garageguy

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
45 minutes ago, NOBLNG said:

The apostrophe contraction only takes the place of the i in “is”. Try saying these with “is” in place of the “ ‘s”. If it doesn’t sound correct, it’s not.  Airbags’ WOULD mean owned by an airbag.
No airbag’s foolproof. (correct)

No airbag’s or seatbelts. (Incorrect)

This is the old airbags’ house. (Correct…I think)

 

There's no contraction here (like there's) so don't muddy the issue.

The issue here is about plurals and apostrophes and ownership.

Many people seem to use apostrophes randomly, sometimes to indicate plural (more than one) which is WRONG.

But the rules are simple.

Plural is signified usually by simply adding an "s" to the root word. NO APOSTROPHY (And let's not go down the rabbit hole of words that have oddball plurals, like hippopotami, OK?)

More than one airbag is airbags.

An apostrophe signifies possession if it's BETWEEN the root word and the "s" if the root is singular: airbag's (one airbag owns something).

An apostrophe signifies possession if it's AFTER the root word ending in "s" if it's plural (more than one): airbags' (multiple airbags own something).

"This is the old airbag's house" means ONE airbag owns the house.

"This is the old airbags' house" means MULTIPLE airbags are found there.

There will be a test Tuesday. Failure is not an option.   ;)

 

 

Edited by Ace-Garageguy
  • Like 1
Snake45 MCM Ohana

Snake45

Posted
Posted

And while we're on the subject, more or less, one of my alltime pet peeves is using an apostrophe in the possessive "its."  "It's" means "it is." "Its" means "belonging to it." 

And why is there no apostrophe in the possessive its? I can teach you this in about ten seconds and you'll own it forever. Ready? 

Here are the possessive pronouns: 

My/mine

Your/yours

Our/ours

His

Her/hers

Their/theirs

Its

Do you see it? There are no apostrophes in ANY of them. So, for uniformity, there is no apostrophe in "its." 

Now you own it forever. Here endeth the lesson. Go and sin no more. B)

 

 

  • Like 1
Oldcarfan27 MCM Ohana

Oldcarfan27

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Ace-Garageguy said:

"This is the old airbags' house" means MULTIPLE airbags are found there.

There will be a test Tuesday.  ;)

But if airbag is a personal name, wouldn't it be Airbag's?

Just askin'.

Oldcarfan27 MCM Ohana

Oldcarfan27

Posted
Posted (edited)

And while we're (we are) on the subject, "their" (possessive), there (location) and they're (they are)...

Are not interchangeable pronouns!!

Edited by Oldcarfan27
  • Thanks 1
Ace-Garageguy MCM Ohana

Ace-Garageguy

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Oldcarfan27 said:

But if airbag is a personal name, wouldn't it be Airbag's?

Just askin'.

That one's kinda tricky, but basically the same if you think about it.

If it was the old house of one person named Airbag (Mr. Airbag), you'd be correct.

But if it was the old house of the family of multiple people named Airbag (the Airbags), it would be the old Airbags' house.

Isn't pedantry fun?  B)

 

Edited by Ace-Garageguy
CLARITY
Monty MCM Ohana

Monty

Posted
Posted

This has been irritating me for some time, so I'm glad to see someone is finally taking it on.  

Here's what's embarrassing:  Over the years we've had any number of foreign members (mostly European from what I could tell) and they never had any issues using apostrophes correctly, despite the fact that English may not have been their first language, while some American posters mystified me by using them in an almost random way.  I've seen sentences with two plural nouns but only one had the (incorrect) apostrophe.  What rationale were they using to make that decision?

For those of us who learned to use apostrophes the correct way, so much of what we see posted looks as silly as someone typing a'u't'o'm'o'b'i'l'e's. 

Really don't get it.    

  • Thanks 1
bobthehobbyguy MCM Ohana

bobthehobbyguy

Posted
Posted (edited)

This recent discussion on punctuation definitely fits for a laugh category. Why else would we come to this model building site? Best laugh in a while. Doubt anyone will top it!

Edited by bobthehobbyguy
  • Like 1
Ace-Garageguy MCM Ohana

Ace-Garageguy

Posted
  • Author
Posted
25 minutes ago, bobthehobbyguy said:

...Best laugh in a while. Doubt anyone will top it!

Just read or listen to what passes for "journalism" today.

It'd be hysterically funny if it wasn't so pathetic.

  • Like 1
DPNM MCM Ohana

DPNM

Posted
Posted

Grammatical errors are one of my top pet peeves. They are so common now I have just decided to "shine them on". If you notice there is an error in the Noah meme and the one with the pipe wrench welded to the bumper. 

There are enough meme's just in this thread to attest to the fact that people are just plain stupid (not you Bill). I doubt that is a lack of caring. I believe that correct sentence structure has not been taught for years. 

I bought a sewing machine from a lady 79 years young today. We were talking about how they no longer teach cursive writing in school. My question was, how will these students legally sign their name?

  • Like 2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...