Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

unclescott58

Members
  • Posts

    10,599
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by unclescott58

  1. Looks good.
  2. Beautiful.
  3. Look again Snake. The old Monogram Sport coupe, right on the box "1932 Ford Deuce Five-Window." How does that not qualify as a '32. Remember Snake. Old Uncle Scott is always rights. I thought we cleared that up? ?
  4. I have never seen the show. So I never understood why a spaceship would look like and be named after and old WWII Japanese battleship? That said, I do think you did a good job building the model, Steve.
  5. This is not my kit. It's a picture I found on the web showing the exact pre-paint 300C I have. Again, Forest Green? Or is it Parade Green?
  6. Went over to the Hamtramck Resistry web site, and found a color chart for the '57 Chryslers. The color on my pre-painted 300C looks more like Forest Green.
  7. I like the above better ☝️ The color thing brings up a question. Several years ago Ertl released several models, including this kit, with pre-painted bodies. The 300C I got was painted in a very dark green. Anybody know how close this is to the green used on the real cars? The color looks darker than what is shown above.
  8. That reminds me. I need to pull mine out and build it one of these days.
  9. Stunning restoration. I like it.
  10. Very nice.
  11. Very nice. It deserves the award it got. Congratulations. ?
  12. Oh come on Snake. You know I'm always right. Right? ?
  13. Wow! Looks great.
  14. Stunning.
  15. The above discussion reminds me of my all time favorite joke. Why do chicken coops have two doors? If they had four doors, they'd be chicken sedans.
  16. Then why do the four boxes above list the kits as Sedans? And not just two-doors? Normally when I hear talk about two-doors, it's talk about coupes. Talking about sedans, normally revolves around four-doors. Plus, my criticism was not to be taken to seriously. You'll notice, this was my second post on the subject. And I made no mention of the issue in the first. And, yes the Revell's are the best. Two-door sedan, two-door coupe (three-window or five), and two-door roadster. Lastly, for those who may not know. Ford back in the day called their two-door sedans, Tudor Sedans. And their four-door sedans, Fordor Sedans. I always especially liked the term "Fordor." Cute.
  17. I agree with Lee above. "Very nice."
  18. Finished as of last night. Fujimi's 1/24 scale De Tomaso Pantera kit. It a curb side, so no engine. And it is not a perfect replica of the Panteras as they were sold in Lincoln-Mercury stores in the 70's. But, this kit is a close to any small bumper U.S. spec Pantera that I've seen.
  19. The only mistake here is that you really should have titled this thread "Best '32 Deuce two-door sedan kits. For there are other '32 Ford two-door model kits other than the ones shown here. In fact two I like even better than those above. The roadsters and the coupes. Still, the one I don't have and want is still AMT's two-door sedan.
  20. Can you tell us more about the Doozy Roadside models above? How are they? And what all comes with them?
  21. Two that are not cars, but models I've always wanted. I finally got a chance to build both last year.
  22. The best one of the four above? Probably the newer Revell kit. I have it and the MPC Switchers kit. But, the one I really want is the old AMT one. (But without the Willys. I have enough of those already.)
  23. This is like asking, "which of your children do you like the best?" Despite that, I'm more of a Deuce guy. I also wonder what happens if we throw the "T" in there too?
×
×
  • Create New...