Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

StevenGuthmiller

Members
  • Posts

    15,071
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by StevenGuthmiller

  1. I’ve had this same philosophy now for some time. sometimes people don’t, or can’t understand how someone can spend months or years on a project, but for me, it’s not so much about the final result, but getting there. There are times when I even get a little bit of guff from other hobbyists for spending a week on a steering wheel, or 3 weeks rebuilding a dash board, but I really love working on the intricacies of certain aspects of the build. I even find myself feeling something of a mild depression after finishing a build that’s been on my bench for a year or more, and if it wasn’t for the thrill of the thought of what I had planned for the next project, it would be hard to move on. I almost can’t imagine opening up a box, throwing on some paint, and sticking a model together in a couple of weeks anymore. There’s no longer any joy in that for me. Steve
  2. Looks pretty close to the same color wood used in the '64 Bonneville that I'm working on. I just used Testors "Wood" with a little brown dry brushed on, and a coat of clear gloss. Steve
  3. Moving along with the interior, today I got a start on the Alclad for a bunch of the interior parts, and while I wait for them to dry, I began a few other details. Got the dash mounted tach ready for a decal, painted and grunged up the ash tray, finished the wood grain on the dash and steering wheel, added the kick panel vents and detailed the courtesy lights in the door panels, and darkened the seat, door panel and dash gaps. Steve
  4. They all appear to be extremely close. Almost no difference in the length or wheel base between the Olds and the '65 or '67 Chevelle. Whichever Brandon settles on, it will need to be narrowed a bit to fit in the Olds body. They're all a little too wide. Olds chassis left, '65 Chevelle right. '65 Chevelle left, '67 Chevelle right. '65 Chevelle chassis in the Olds body. Steve
  5. Just looking at a side by side comparison, the AMT '69 appears to be very close. I don't have a Revell kit, but I assume that they would be pretty close scale wise. If anything, the '66/'67 Olds appears to be too long. But the earlier Chevelles appear to be pretty close. The '65 looks spot on. 1967 1966 1965 When I do my '64 Pontiac LeMans, the '65 Chevelle is going to be the likely candidate for the chassis. It appears that it might be the best for the '64 Cutlass as well. Steve
  6. Actually, those slots were there in '62. But I agree. The headlight bezel appears to be pretty much square, as compared to the "kidney" shaped '62 bezel, so my guess would be 1964 or later. Steve
  7. Or if it's important enough to you, you can always look for a '62 annual. Of course you'd need to source the step side bed elsewhere, as the annual was an Apache long bed. I have one, but it would take a fairly hefty trade to pry it away from me. Steve
  8. There's probably any number of kits that could be used for donors. Of course you would need to check all of these out to see how close they would be. AMT 1966 442 AMT 1965 Chevelle Lindberg 1967 442 Lindbrg 1966 Chevelle Revell 1967 Chevelle Maybe the Revell '66 GTO? Heck, I'll bet even the new Revell 1968/'69 Chevelles would get you very close. Steve
  9. I also pin with styrene rod and hit the back side with epoxy if possible. If not, a tiny dab of epoxy in the hole, and the part is not going anywhere. Steve
  10. Thanks everyone! Beginning to get a little of the interior detailing going. Foiled the finned dash bright work panel and the Bonneville emblem and darkened the backgrounds on both. Also painted the wood dash panel and the steering wheel spokes. Just the beginning of a lot of detail going into the dash and other interior parts. Anybody know why there seems to be a problem with uploading photos onto the forum? Haven't been able to do a simple copy and paste for the past couple of days. Had to post these linked photos from my Fotki account. Steve
  11. Looks like you're coming along pretty quickly. A lot faster than I usually can muster. Here's what I did to transform my '67 Bonneville console from an automatic to a four speed. The '67 console was molded to the tub floor, so in short, I ground a notch in the side, sanded and filled the automatic detail, redid the wood grain, and added a shift gate cut from a Revell '66 GTO console. It came out pretty nicely. Steve
  12. I have an IPhone SE. Seems to take pretty good pictures. Steve
  13. You do have to be careful about using a “primer/filler” on models. It’s designed to fill in scratches and imperfections, which could also fill in detail. Steve
  14. Now THAT’s some cool stuff! There’s a few bucks worth of plastic there! Steve
  15. Thanks everyone! Time to start detail work on the interior. I pretty much got all of the foil applied to the interior parts today. Now it's on to paint detail and a bunch of parts that need Alclad. Steve
  16. For me, it's more a matter of selecting a good primer that does what you expect of it. A primer that's not necessarily formulated for styrene is fine, if you know that going in, and you know how to deal with it. The most frequent problem that I see is people running down to the hardware store and grabbing a random can of "something", (half of the time there's no indication of what's in the can, other than "primer") and then wondering why they're having problems with it. The same thing applies for paint and clear. Find something,.......anything, that works for you, (preferably something that doesn't say "Chuck's universal, one coat, primer, paint and clear coat" on the can) and stick with it! In the end, you're likely always going to be better off with something that you don't find in the bargain bin. Steve
  17. I don't remember for certain if the hardtop kit included optional bumpers for the grille guard up front, and continental kit in the rear, But Mark is correct. The standard convertible kit only includes the grille guard, and continental kit bumpers. Not sure if the pace car kit has both, or just the bare bumpers. However, they are all interchangeable if you have the different versions. Steve
  18. The hard top with opening doors is an entirely different animal. Steve
  19. True. But if your paint adhesion isn't good, you're probably heading towards other problems as well. Masking may not be in your future either. If my paint adheres as well as the 2-part epoxy I'm using, I'm in great shape. Steve
  20. Very good kit. Same as the hard top kit. Steve
  21. Oh, okay. Still a '33 Cadillac. Steve
  22. It's a '33 Cadillac. I had the Testors Fleetwood version. Steve
  23. I use pretty much nothing but clear 2 part epoxy for gluing everything now. I know, it's more work than other glues, but I don't have to worry about fogging paint, chrome or glass as with super glue, if I apply the glue and let it cure for ten minutes before attaching the parts, I don't have to worry about glue "squeeze out", and once the glue is fully cured, your parts aren't going anywhere.........and I don't scrape paint or chrome off of anything before gluing. Steve
  24. Good stuff! Pretty much all I use, and you can spray ANYTHING over it. It has the added benefit of making it possible to remove any kind of paint relatively easily. Steve
  25. Everything is foil. Steve
×
×
  • Create New...