Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Force

Members
  • Posts

    4,592
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Force

  1. I have the Stevens International issue of this kit from 2008 with close to the same boxart, Kit #38687.
  2. Here is my only wrecker built years ago.
  3. I follow several racing series and I don't think going further away from what the cars are supposed to be is the solution to the problem with the diminishing interest for the sport, they have to take a step or two back to the origins, the public has to recognize the cars and they should be more like the ones you can buy from the showroom floor. Of course you can't go back on safety, that's crucial, but leave the exotic materials out of it as much as possible to keep the costs down...and for gods sake, don't even think of going the hybrid way if you want to cut the costs for the teams, it's expensive enough as it is without that. You only have to look at F1, the hybrid power units they use now are so expensive to develop and manitain that there are only 4 manufacturers who supplies the power units for all 20 cars from the 10 teams in F1 (Mercedes 6 cars, Ferrari 6, Honda 4 and Renault 4), and even tho' there has been interests from other manufacturers it's too expensive to develop a competitive power unit and get something back out of it, so there will most likely be no more than the 4 that's in right now as long as the regulations are as they are. The engines they have now in NASCAR is not on the option list for any street going car, they are specially developed for NASCAR racing and shares nothing with the production engines except that they are V8's, that's maybe where you could cut costs, go back to base the racing engines in NASCAR on regular production engines instead of the special engines they use today, I don't know why they allowed these special engines in the first place, the old rule was that the engines used in NASCAR racing had to be production engines available to the public in regular cars. The bodies they have in NASCAR today looks quite like the street going counterparts...but...they are both wider and longer that the street car, just take a look on the Pace Car if it's a Camry, Camaro or Mustang and you see what I mean...at least the Camry looks very tiny compared with the NASCAR racing version. And please...don't go to 18 inch wheels with center nuts, if they do that they could allow air jacks as well and allow 4 guys over the wall with an air gun each and a pressurized fueling rig so a pit stop takes 3 seconds...boring...the pit stops is interesting as it is with 5 lugnuts per wheel and I like the look of the 15 inch wheels...and they have worked so far so why shouldn't they do that in the future. NASCAR isn't the only sanctioning body with diminishing interest, NHRA have the same problem with the Pro Stock class, both from competitors and public, boring cokie cutter cars that doesn't look like the street car they are supposed to be and mostly all with the same engines (not production engines)...on the other hand the Factory Stock and Factory Super Stock classes are growing rapidly and has gained lots of interest...I wonder why.
  4. I believe all the AMT 1963 Galaxie kits are based on the same tooling, the bodies and glass are different, the 63½ fastback kit still has the convertible interior tub wich is wrong for the hard tops. The tail lights are not that accurate in the AMT kits as one can see, even the bezels are way too beefy, they are much slimmer on the real cars...I know, I have one. I wish someone would do better more accurate 63½ and 64 Galaxie kits as the ones we have now has lots to desire. Round2 could easily do them based on their excellent 1960 Starliner tooling, keep the chassis, engine and suspension and do new bodies, chrome and interiors and you would have great kits.
  5. I think the truck you built is the regular T600A kit as the side skirts are different on the Canepa version...but it looks nice anyway. ? I built the Canepa version for my Castrol GTX Top Fuel Team transporter years ago and had no major issues with it...are these good accurate kits...naah, not really...but they are for sure buildable and looks decent on the shelf. Here is a couple of pictures of the two different versions of the AMT T600A kit so you see the difference. The regular T600A And the Canepa Version, the wheel covers are in both kits but the front bumper and side skirts are different on the Canepa version.
  6. Cool, I like the old AA/FA's
  7. Nice job on that Ferrari.
  8. Very nice, the 1961 Buick Invicta is on my favourite cars list.
  9. It came out very nice. ?
  10. The DM800 is not the prettiest truck in the World but this is a well executed build anyway.
  11. Nice clean build. ?
  12. Ouch!! That's not a site you want to see.
  13. I agree with that. A plane with sky divers crashed on an island in the river that goes through our town about 2-3 miles from where I live just a month ago and all 9 aboard lost their life, 1 pilot and 8 sky divers, a couple of my friends have summer houses about 200 yards from the crash site and was there when it happened. It looks like Dale Jr and his family is fairly ok and that's good.
  14. I also want to thank you and all other moderators for what you do...I enjoy being here.
  15. I am most surprised that they didn't change the suspension on the F-4270, as far as I know that kit had air ride as long as it was available and it was available a couple of years after the 4300 came.
  16. Well that might be true, but his contact information is at his Fotki album, look at the top and you'll find his email and website.
  17. I second those statements, simply the best out there.
  18. The links work allright for me...but you must be logged in to see them as they are in his signature. Here is his fotki page: https://public.fotki.com/RaysKits/
  19. Yes he does, look at the signature under his posts and you will find links to his stuff.
  20. It looks like they did.
  21. I assume they are printed by Cartograf.
×
×
  • Create New...