-
Posts
12,869 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by Chuck Most
-
Okay... more stock than what they run today, anyhow!
-
Nice 4 doors
Chuck Most replied to gray07's topic in 1:1 Reference Photos: Auto Shows, Personal vehicles (Cars and Trucks)
Okay, I'll play... -
How's about what's new at Round 2?
Chuck Most replied to Chuck Most's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
If you mean this one- Yes, it should have the semi tractor frame rails in it. -
How's about what's new at Round 2?
Chuck Most replied to Chuck Most's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
I'm going by memory here, but I think the tractor framerails had a bit more taper to them at the rear than the stake rails, which are pretty much totally flat. Even so, (and even if I'm dead wrong) it wouldn't be a big ordeal to shorten the stake frame, or move the axle ahead the desired amount and 'bob' the frame after it, since the other tractor pieces appear to be intact. The tractor rails would've been a bonus, though, and might well have helped AMT sell a few more of these. -
Revell preview photos from Toledo NNL #31
Chuck Most replied to SteveG's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
Hmmmmm.... I like the idea, but I dunno. I guess it kind of depends on what kind of 'custom' parts are included. '40 Fords have had everything from nerf bumpers and skirts to canted quad headlamps added to them- but I'm thinking the resulting kit would be a mostly otherwise stock '40 with a chopped top. Not necessarily a bad thing, IMHO, but maybe not "Kustom" enough to draw in a new audience. And if they did go with a more extreme custom it might go too far and scare off people who'd otherwise be into it. I guess its doable, and I think it would be a good seller, but they'd be walking a tightrope in how they approached what parts/modifications to include. -
Yes- Ken and Drew- the window net does more closely resemble a storm drain grate- and theoretically it shouldn't even be there, as I don't see a driver behind the wheel! I thought of cutting it out, but that would have been against the 'approach it like the typical snap kit buyer' mindset- I really wanted to get a good idea how the thing went together, as AMT intended, and to that end, I wasn't too badly disappointed. Drew... I KNEW I could depend on you to point out the tire lettering issue- long a pet peeve of mine as well on stock car models! Not sure about the wing- I think the 1:1 piece is pretty ungainly, maybe that's skewing my judgement. Mark- hadn't heard of the glue kits being canceled- I was really hoping to see how Round 2's first full detail glue kit would be, even if I'm not a huge fan of the subject matter. (Yes, I admit, I long for the good old days when a stock car was, indeed, mostly stock!) with all the 'licencing' and 'lack of interest' revolving around modern NASCAR and kits of late, I'm actually a bit surprised the snap kits made it to the shelves. Chuck (not me, the other one)-I kind of wonder if I inadvertently broke those tabs- I'll certainly be checking it out. I've always kind of considered the 1980's Monogram stock cars to be the gold standard of the genre. Not TOTALLY perfect (sorry,NO kit is perfect), but very nicely detailed and executed. Then the Revell Dodge Intrepid came... then the last stock car kit I bought, AMT's Taurus, driven by Mark Martin before he turned traitor and went to Chevy, and still wearing the #6 and 'little blue pill' sponsorship. Detail wasn't bad- but the flash and warped parts, and brittle decals guaranteed it would never stray too far from its original box, at least for me. This one is pretty far from the old Monogram kits, but on the other hand, I'd rather build one of these than the AMT Taurus, even if the Taurus is better detailed. (But I'd rather build an old Monogram T-Bird than either of them!) I do agree with Drew that NASCAR kits don't seem to get the same attention lavished on them as other subjects of late. A modern COT, done to the same level of almost-greatness we see with the current spate of new and revised tooling, shouldn't exactly be a slow seller, at least the way I see it. But then again, I keep hoping Revell will reissue a '70 Mustang with a correct grille, or the Jeep J-10 Honcho, or the old Monogram Land Rover... so maybe I don't see things too clearly!
-
One of my all-time favorite articles is the one he did for SAE, the one about the SC/Rambler! The Buick buildup (where he built the Monogram '70 into a model of an actual car owned by the president of the Buick club), is one I still haven't tried, but plan to one of these days!
-
Any late model Quad Cab trucks?
Chuck Most replied to ian ashton's topic in Car Aftermarket / Resin / 3D Printed
You might want to get with Aftashox- I think he used a resin cab on that wild green Ford SD he build a year or two back. I'm thinking of stretching a testors F-250 into a Crew Cab, but I've never cut and pasted die cast metal before! -
The way the suspension is set up in that kit doesn't lend itself well to modification. I'd say use 'dropped spindles' (play along! I mean move the wheel back pins up higher on the spindles), and 'cut the coils' (Or air bags, rather) down, and trim/bend the control arms to suit. You won't be able to lay it flat on the rockers without some serious cutting and pasting, but that ought to get it a bit closer to terra firma, anyway.
-
Even though the Chevy Impala Dale Jr. zips around the track is about as close to your grandma's Impala as Mississippi is to the Klingon homeworld, they still call 'em 'stock cars'. The newest totally un-stock stock car, the COT ("Car of Tomorrow", or since it's current now, "Car of Today"), is now available in kit form, thanks to the boys at Round 2. Let me be quite clear on one thing first- this IS a snap kit. But I don't see parts count or skill level when I check out kits, I only consider what can be done with those (possibly limited in number, possibly simplified) parts. In that respect, you get a pretty good curbside model of a modern NASCAR 'stocker'. The hood and trunk on this snap kit are separate pieces, but held in place with small tabs- if you were so inclined, I'm sure you could take this snap kit, easily open those panels, and slide a modernized '90's/'00's AMT-Ertl Cup chassis underneath this, and adapt the snapper's interior bits and cage to it. Then you'd just need to figure out how to replicate the new NASCAR spec GM V8 to cap it all off. Of course, this really only applies if you simply cannot wait for the full glue kit, or don't want to spend a bucketload of money on resin and decals. I suspect AMT will use this exact same body on the glue kits. When I built this, I tried to approach it as I would have as I did at age 10- "Just blast this thing together and on to the next one! Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles is on in an hour!" Since it was a snap kit- I didn't encounter any significant assembly issues. I've spoken to a couple of local modelers who built the Dale Jr. version, and said the rollcage fit was a bit fussy- I can't confirm that, for me at least, the rollcage was a cakewalk. Some of the ejector pin divots had weird, spear-like plastic flash growing from them, but this was easily dealt with. The runners attaching the seat to the sprue did seem a bit thick, but nothing even a newbie modeler should have much trouble with. The only real problem I had was breaking two of the struts which support the chin spoiler- they're very delicate, and even after cleaning the flash (not much, but it doesn't take much on a part the size of a flea's waist) and 'chasing' the holes with a small drill bit, two broke while I tried to install them- I'll probably make up replacements from styrene rod later. I really only have two gripes about the kit, and one may be my fault... First, thought the factory applied paint is very nice, it was applied over a body which was not prepped- mold lines and flash stick out like a sore thumb on the 48's dark blue paint. Second- and I'm not sure if this was a huge oversight in the kit's design or if I overlooked something in the instructions, but there's nothing to fasten the rear of the chassis to the body- pick up the car by the roof, and the rear of the chassis just flops out. The front is fastened with two screws, hidden by the chin spoiler. I chose the #48 Jimmie Johnson Lowe's Impala for three reasons. First, the other guys all had the Dale Jr. Car. Two, his sponsor is Lowes, Round 2 is owned by Tom Lowe (not sure if there's a relation), and third, my brother H-A-T-E-S Jimmy Johnson, as I guess many other NASCAR fans do. Assembly took about 45 minutes, not counting the half hour or so I spent looking for a screwdriver thin and long enough to fit into the tunnels to mount the front of the chassis. I still haven't decided to use the decals or stickers- I'll probably go with the decals, just because I know AMT's new sheets are nicely printed and lay down well, AND look way better than stickers ever could. I did no detailing or paint whatsoever on this one, what you see is what you get.
-
AMT 65 Continental
Chuck Most replied to Jantrix's topic in General Automotive Talk (Trucks and Cars)
Oh... duh! Right... wasn't used widely in Fords, I guess... -
How's about what's new at Round 2?
Chuck Most replied to Chuck Most's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
And that's a 'negative' on the new C-600 including the tractor framerails, though all the other vestigial tractor parts are still there. -
Five pages....AND several months ago! I felt it good enough a joke to bear a repeat!
-
How's about what's new at Round 2?
Chuck Most replied to Chuck Most's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
The fifth wheel is still there, as are the mudflaps- I'll have to check and see if the framerails are included, too. The most recent MPC reissue had the correct tunneled rear window, if that's what you mean- I can't imagine why Round 2 would go back to using the old 500/Daytona body on this one, even for a somewhat cheesy reissue like this. -
Wow.... now there's an answer for ya!
-
Looks like another beauty in the works, John!
-
I see... lead us in with the Humvee then, bam, hit us with the jeep! Love 'em both!
-
A man and his buddy were out golfing on a course near a highway. A funeral procession rolled by. The man took off his hat, bowed his head, and said a prayer for the departed. "Wow", his buddy said, "that's the most touching, and considerate thing I've ever seen you do." The man nodded as he watched the procession go by, put his hat back on and said, "Well... I was married to her for 35 years."
-
Revell preview photos from Toledo NNL #31
Chuck Most replied to SteveG's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
I have to wonder,though, if in that particular case, it was the woefully ill-proportioned body which killed the kits appeal to replica stock fans. Still, I do see (and believe) what you are saying! -
Revell preview photos from Toledo NNL #31
Chuck Most replied to SteveG's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
The lack of stock parts and a stock height roof will NOT be preventing me from buying the '48, though I do agree with my rep-stock brethren that I wish it had a stock height roof. Judging from the Kustom Kontent in the photos posted, I won't be too disappointed by the released kit. I'm just glad Revell is in a position to keep up with the modified reissues and new tool kits- they keep 'em coming, and I'll keep buying 'em... provided I like the 1:1 subject of course! In this case, I do. -
AMT 65 Continental
Chuck Most replied to Jantrix's topic in General Automotive Talk (Trucks and Cars)
Just to clarify- the MEL engine was never used in Fords, it was used in big Mercs for a few years, and in Lincolns exclusively up until 1967. Other FoMoCo's ran the FE as the biggest engine. But now that you mention it, yeah- I've never seen a big Ford V8 with a cross ram setup, either! -
My 36 Chevy truck
Chuck Most replied to a topic in WIP: Model Trucks: Pickups, Vans, SUVs, Light Commercial
I keep telling him he should've let a resin caster borrow that beauty before he finished her up! -
Best use of a Daisy Duke kit I've ever seen, Terry!