-
Posts
5,277 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by Scale-Master
-
Your detailing has brought it to life. I built one of those too, except for the sink marks in the body it was a blast to build. I took the easy way on mine, looks like you invested a bit more, nice work.
-
Bobby, I have to say Jeff has made some pertinent and valid points here about that "running 1/25 scale engine". Augie was pretty much a regular attendee at the GSL's for sometime, (that is where I met him). And he took Best Of Show multiple times. I am sure I would have known of this engine as we mostly discussed machining model engine parts in our conversations, and a running engine would most likely have eclipsed the awesome static work I know he did. Even putting a tiny electric motor in/under an engine that scale and making it operate would be unbelievable. And if you are referring to the radial airplane engine about the size of a dime? I saw that in person and it was not motorized. Was there another one? I'd like to see that. I'm sure Bob would be aware of an operating 1/25th scale internal combustion or motorized or steam engine made by Augie, please ask him. It would very cool if it were true though...
-
My real name is in my last post, and every other one I have made here. It has been couple/few years since I spoke to him. See my name at the bottom of this post?
-
Hey Bobby, when you talk to Bob K. tell him hi from me. Been a while since I spoke with him, is he still doing the furniture thing?
-
Not to steal Tom’s thunder, but the windshield frame is included on the chrome shot. Looking good Tom.
-
Thanks for the info. But I have to ask for clarification about your comment of Augie (Hiscano) building a running 1/25 scale small block Chevy? I knew Augie, and I don’t recall anything like that, granted he was a very humble man, but I am shocked that I did not know about a running 1/25 scale small block Chevy. That would be an incredible feat. Please clarify. Thanks.
-
I think using brass is a good way to go. It provides strength and a solid base to build to. Especially after opening the panels, a rigid stable brass frame can really pay off in the end. Tell me about the radiator, the pic is a little blurry but I can see through it. Not trying to start up anything, but I think the reason an issue was made about scratch-building is due to the revered level of skill it takes to scratch-build well. Throwing the term around can be interpreted as an insult to those who do actual scratch-building, and there is a definition for scratch-building, not subject to such loose interpretations in my opinion.
-
Do you keep the box?
Scale-Master replied to Hattley's topic in General Automotive Talk (Trucks and Cars)
For some reason I end up keeping quite a few, but only because they are "needed" to hold things. I do try to keep and file all instructions. Of course I keep the decals and any useable left over parts. -
Being a long term 1/43 builder, this strikes a chord with me. Not much American Muscle in 1/43rd compared to the subjects available. Looks better than many can do in 1/25 scale. Clean job!
-
Yes, but this isn't one of them. And it does not match the Z/28.
-
Needed a quick and simple build to relax with. First one of these I have built. Fun little kit. Wanted something loud. Custom mix violet Dupont Chromabase with Tamiya Fluorescent Red over Tamiya Yellow and some solid red and yellow stripes. Loud enough now?
-
My name is Betelgeuse-Betelgeuse-Betelgeuse and I like dioramas.
-
“This is a Miltary owned color and still have the rights to it, The do not even let you have the color code or even the PPG Store here could have the code.†You should have checked the Federal Standard guide (F.S.) for that “military colorâ€. All “military†colors are assigned an F.S. number and the book is readily available to civilians, as it is in the public domain since the military is funded by our tax dollars… Just ask someone who builds airplane models. Testors may even have the color in their military line of paints.
-
I find it interesting the one person is offering firsthand experience and sharing his method and results, and another is trying to justify his methods as being the better way by bolstering his claims of experience with second hand knowledge he got from friends and acquaintances. Just a footnote, I have been employed as a “real†automotive painter as well as a model painter. Doing is way more conducive to learning than talking and telling what was heard from someone else. And it is Mark Taylor the one that can build the 24 hour wonders, not me. As for the Matrix, I use MSV-21. California has restrictions on what we can purchase…
-
If you were to show a quality finished part that you made of what you were trying to explain, it would go a lot further in the direction of any tutorial. Most builders want to learn tricks and tips to improve their models. Also do some comparisons of what others are doing to see if what you are offering is truly relevant and useful towards improving other’s builds. Keep up the enthusiasm and thanks for sharing.
-
I have used the solder with rosin (not resin) core. There is also acid core, it is different. One trick is to soak the lengths of solder you cut for your pipes in hot water; you will have to reheat the water a few times. Add hot water to the solder, don’t nuke it… The heat will soften the rosin, some will drip out. You can force more out with compressed air and thin wire, (depending on how long your pieces are…). Lacquer thinner or carb cleaner helps with the clean up.
-
It is my opinion that if you want to learn how to work with urethane's and have the least amount of headaches you should follow David's advice. The points he makes mirror the same experiences I have had, and I have seen his paint/finish work in person. "Dave's way" is one of the many right ways to paint. Just look at his results. Chas's comment amounts to bad mouthing a DuPont competitor's product, instead of accepting someone else has the ability to paint and is willing to properly teach others. Brand loyalty is one thing, ignorant snobbery is another. I know a lot of people who get great results with both PPG and DuPont products. I also use Matrix and PCL clears and DuPont Chroma colors. Snidely portraying a product that looks to be applied with better results (than the product you are using) by someone else is bad form and serves no purpose. Not finishing the paint after it is sprayed is often the difference between being complacent and accepting what was shot, (which is fine if you are happy) and really making a 100 Point finish. Remember, you have to build for yourself... Real car paints look like real car paints when properly applied to models, the only problem is they often look out of scale due to the way they lay down. Cutting and finishing them properly can bring them into scale. Some soft flowing cars can get away with comparatively thick but smooth uncut finishes. But what treatment do the best of the best real cars get after being painted? David's photos really don't do the paint quality justice. That green truck won best paint because it is flawless, I know, I was there. Seriously, no defects. Take a second to think about NO DEFECTS. Honestly, how many absolutely perfect paint jobs has anyone seen? It may look boring, but that just leaves less areas to hide any imperfections. And speaking of those photos, thanks for wearing pants in that last one David! Also follow Ed's advice about the respirators to avoid headaches. You can also add me to the list of lacquer thinner users...
-
As a Hot Wheels customizer myself, I can see the work you put into that. It is a tough sell to pull off what you did in a small scale and post it with "full-size" models. You may have fooled some into thinking it is larger than it really is. If so, good job.
-
Just quick Hot Wheels as a present for a buddy...
-
See Steve... I told you it was an Oberg! (I did answer via PM...) Thanks everyone. Truly a fun build for me. And the front doesn't drag, the shadows however are sharp.
-
As far as the sponsorship on this one, specifically the tailgate as requested... I was just following through with a comment I made about building something I thought was humorous a few months ago. It was a by product of conversations on this very forum: A quote from a prolifically posting younger member about his Rockford Files Firebird and the amount of time he claimed to have invested in building it: "and second I have over 800 hours into that car." Reference: http:/e/www.modelcarsmag.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=30718&st=20 And an answer I provided to that same person's request for a towing company name: "I still think Firebird Wrecking is my best offering… Cmon, call 1-800-Hour-Firebird? I may just have to build it…" Reference: http://www.modelcarsmag.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=31554&st=60 Post # 68 http://www.modelcarsmag.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=31554&st=20 Just noticed, we never did get to see those pictures of those real trucks as offered up in that thread too... The engine is the kit supplied parts with a new intake and some detailing. See provided WIP link in first pot of this thread.
-
Very cool vintage work there Dan. So does this mean you are about to start building again?
-
No sir, I will not take that ill advice, one should never get involved in a land war in Asia...
-
SuperTruck Finished [PICS] May have spanned a couple of months, but it was actually a rather quick build considering actual time investment. But it was fun! No decals for the exterior, just painting. Ghost gray real flames? A few machined details, detail decals from the parts box, seat harnesses made of vinyl and mylar, wheels and tires from some Tamiya leftovers... WIP thread: http://www.modelcarsmag.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=32485