Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

Started to head a bit off track in the AMT 1936 Ford thread, so starting this one on the Monogram kit. If anyone wants to add in information on other issues of the Monogram 1936 Ford, please feel free to do so.

Going by the instruction sheet this issue of the kit was offered in 1974, a convertible only version of an older 6 in 1 kit that builds a custom 1936 Ford. It does not come with stock wheels or engine. Replacing those items would appear to allow a factory stock car to be built from the kit.

The instructions say the kit engine is a 1948 Mercury with a 3 carburetor set up.

It can be built top up, or top down. The rumble seat appears to be designed to be movable allowing it to open and close.

The Monogram and AMT kits build different convertible top vehicles. The Monogram kit builds a convertible or cabriolet, the AMT kit can be built as a roadster. The convertible was a higher end vehicle with roll up side windows for better protection from the elements. The Roadster has no side windows and uses a different windshield which includes wind deflectors on either side.

The kit

1936%20Ford1_zpsjnfikmik.jpg

1936%20Ford2_zpsp0ha7vfe.jpg

1936%20Ford3_zpsun9tpgn3.jpg

1936%20Ford4_zpszjqfahqp.jpg

1936%20Ford5_zpsedtyncs5.jpg

Posted (edited)

Save for the rolling stock, this kit hasn't changed a whole lot since it was first released. This was the last reissue, with the LaSalle style grille, streamlined headlight buckets, and the undersized 1/25 scale whitewall tires being the most notable changes:

zz.jpg.719c237c6a72ef310d460abc0a8c9d61.jpg

 

Edited by Casey
Posted

I built the most recent reissue of the coupe/convertible, seen in Casey's post above with the LaSalle grille. I built mine as close to a "stock" convertible as could be built out of the kit. At the same time I built AMT's '36 as a "stock" 3-window coupe. I liked both kits. I like of AMT one a little better, but had no real complaints about Revell/Monogram kit. It's a good kit, and builds very nicely. And the latest issue comes with some fun options for building different variations. And, so does the AMT kit. Pluses? For an open car, the Revell/monogram kit builds as a true convertible. AMT's a roadster. By 1936, I like the convertible better than the roadster. Minus? AMT's kit can be built "stock." Revell/Monogram's recent reissues. Custom only. Though it can be built to look close to stock. Scale is of course the other issue. Being an old Monogram kit, the Revell/Monogram version is in 1/24th scale. The AMT kit, 1/25th.

Scott

  • 5 years later...
Posted

I have fond memories of building the first version in 1963 when I was 13. (I built it as the white custom.) I managed to find this very nice complete kit about 10 years ago for $26. I've decided it has more nostalgia-value for me if I don't build it.

4fa508beeacd198f82_zpsdf05aa80-vi.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

That early Monogram box art is great. "No Painting Required", then showing six variations, each in a different color...?

 

Posted (edited)

I've never seen the original '36 in any other color than tan, yet the PC89 original issue '58 T-Bird was molded in a number of colors. I've got black, cream, yellow, and red plus I believe there were other colors as well. The cream and yellow have the color listed on the box end seal.

Edited by Phirewriter
Posted
2 hours ago, Casey said:

That early Monogram box art is great. "No Painting Required", then showing six variations, each in a different color...?

 

Well, no painting required provided you could live with the tan color the body is molded in.  Or, as was printed in the old Auto World catalogs, "molded in color, so you don't have to paint it if you don't feel like"...

Posted

The tan wasn't so bad if you were planning on building it stock. Any other way, not so much.

I had an original T-Bird in black and a 55 Chevy in red. It was amazing how shiny and swirl-free their molding was back then.

Posted

Got one around '71 and built it stock; I remember it went together very well, and I always thought it captured the "look" of the car better than the AMT kit did. Good rubber tires, too. Wouldn't mind building another someday...

  • 2 months later...
Posted (edited)

Yeah, Dave, I'm with you on that one! I'd love to see that one and the '34 Ford kit returned to their original roots.

Edited by alexis
  • Like 1
  • 2 years later...
Posted

I've been playing with the 1985 issue, myself. The plastic polishes up insanely nice.

2v2eQcvuGxQKCP.jpg

2v2eQBdvMxQKCP.jpg

Rolling stock is from Monogram Custom 58 Tbird/ Skips Fiesta 59 Skyliner. 

2v2eQBd2jxQKCP.jpg

  • Like 5
  • 1 month later...
  • 7 months later...
Posted
On 4/30/2015 at 1:50 PM, Casey said:

Save for the rolling stock, this kit hasn't changed a whole lot since it was first released. This was the last reissue, with the LaSalle style grille, streamlined headlight buckets, and the undersized 1/25 scale whitewall tires being the most notable changes:

zz.jpg.719c237c6a72ef310d460abc0a8c9d61.jpg

 

Actually, this particular issue has a ton of changes. The interior door panels and seat have changed, along with new front and rear axles, and bumpers. I totally agree with you about those undersized wheels. Not at all sure what they were thinking there. This one in my pic was built from a mid 1980s issue. Steering wheel is AMT 50 Ford. Rolling stock from either Revell Skips Fiesta 59 Skyliner or Monogram 58 Thunderbird. Both have these same wheels.

20230215_125641.jpg

20230215_125609.jpg

20230212_182022.jpg

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...