Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, geemoney said:

the Switchers have been re released? 

Not recently...that issue is from 2003...

Edited by Rob Hall
Posted

The only problem I have with this kit as it does not have a gas tank so the rear does not look right,I can put up with the cheesy chassis but the no gas tank needs to be changed if brought back out.

Posted

I am really curious to see how this comes out. Considering the relative availability of the Revell ‘32 Sedan and the very reasonable prices it could be found for, I really don’t understand why would anyone invest the effort in building this. This is why I’m dying to see if anyone can create a decent model from this dog of a model. 

Posted

This. Being around for ages now. Usually can be found online for less than what a new kit goes for ourdays. Two choices of wheels, two choices of engine (a small block Ford and a nice flathead). The most accurate ‘32 frame made to date in 1:25. Easily converted to from Tudor sedan to Sedan Delivery. Can be build with or without fenders. 
    My comment was complimentary to your efforts. It doesn’t change the fact that the kit is a joke. I, for example, don’t have the patience or skill to make that kit  look good. Or rather, I don’t think it’s worth the time or effort, when there is a so much better kit that you can start with, available at pretty much the same price. 
    

75EC65DD-DA08-4A11-9B58-1FA958D3BD8D.jpeg

Posted

Two great reasons right there!  I did the Sedan Delivery about 200 years ago and used an AMT 32 gas tank - I at the time I thought it looked OK.  The fact that the inside edge of the rear fenders is a bit abbreviated means that they require a bit of work first.  If you can get a look at any other AMT, Revell or Monogram Deuce models, maybe  a friend has one, you would get a clear idea of what is required to fix the old MPC model.

Another thought, if you could get hold of some high density plastic foam or a tight grained wood like jelutong,  it would be a relatively straight forward operation to carve a new tank.  You could simply use balsa but I would recommend a generous coat of automotive body putty over the whole unit that you could sand down to size and contour.  Otherwise you will send forever trying to seal and smooth the very open grain inherent with balsa.

 

Hope that helps

Alan

Posted
19 hours ago, mrm said:

This. Being around for ages now. Usually can be found online for less than what a new kit goes for ourdays. Two choices of wheels, two choices of engine (a small block Ford and a nice flathead). The most accurate ‘32 frame made to date in 1:25. Easily converted to from Tudor sedan to Sedan Delivery. Can be build with or without fenders. 
    My comment was complimentary to your efforts. It doesn’t change the fact that the kit is a joke. I, for example, don’t have the patience or skill to make that kit  look good. Or rather, I don’t think it’s worth the time or effort, when there is a so much better kit that you can start with, available at pretty much the same price. 
    

75EC65DD-DA08-4A11-9B58-1FA958D3BD8D.jpeg

Yes that kit is a joke but I am going to see if I can make something out of it.

 

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 11/25/2019 at 7:12 PM, mrm said:

 I really don’t understand why would anyone invest the effort in building this. This is why I’m dying to see if anyone can create a decent model from this dog of a model. 

Because he had it, it is a challenge, and any good builder can make something from a dog kit. I love seeing what I can do with them.

Keep going Jeff, looking good

Posted

I really like seeing the AMT / MPC Deuces being built - they have a character all of their own!  
 

Good start, I’ll be watching! 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 1/18/2020 at 1:36 AM, Sledsel said:

Because he had it, it is a challenge, and any good builder can make something from a dog kit. I love seeing what I can do with them.

Keep going Jeff, looking good

Agreed. Plus, the AMT (nee MPC Switchers) kit has a stock-ish roof height, while the Revell version is mildly chopped.

Just FYI: this AMT(MPC) kit has a too-short cowl, like the rest of the MPC '32 Fords, about halfway between the really too short cowls on the original AMT '32s, and the correct-ish Revell versions.

Posted

This will be of special interest to me, as I currently have more '32 car kits than any other, all of which seem to have issues of one kind or another that need to be dealt with.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...