Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Pinto crash test


NYLIBUD

Recommended Posts

It’s strange, as time goes on,I like this little weird cars more and more.Such as the  Pintio,Gremlins,Pacers,Pinto And Pacer wagons.Thats just a few.There are a lot more.Idk,IMO,they’re cool now.I Grew up in the 80s-90s.Not that matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My sister had a '76 Runabout for her first car...got it new, drove it through college...by the time she moved to Arizona in 1980 it was pretty rusty and worn out...got hit twice in parking lots driving cross country and had big dents in the door, hood and grille was broken out...traded it for a used '77 Datsun 280Z.    Haven't seen a Pinto in ages..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, NYLIBUD said:

It’s strange, as time goes on,I like this little weird cars more and more.Such as the  Pintio,Gremlins,Pacers,Pinto And Pacer wagons.Thats just a few.There are a lot more.Idk,IMO,they’re cool now.I Grew up in the 80s-90s.Not that matters.

The only ones that I ever thought were an attractive car were the Vega's.

A lot like a baby Camaro.

A friend of mine had a Vega exactly like this GT right after high school.

Unfortunately, like most cars from that era, they were monumental turds! :P

 

image.png.7e2329f57427e3298d68ce6fe2ebf274.png

 

 

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, StevenGuthmiller said:

The only ones that I ever thought were an attractive car were the Vega's.

A lot like a baby Camaro.

A friend of mine had a Vega exactly like this GT right after high school.

Unfortunately, like most cars from that era, they were monumental turds! :P

Steve

a friend of mine bought a new Vega wagon when they first came out, he drove it for about 6 months & traded it for a full size Chevy Van.......go figure.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now way back, I rear ended a Pinto with my Dodge Ramcharger sliding on ice, When I hit the Pinto I was expecting the worst of explosion and fire between the two cars, I remember that big rear window shattering to a million pieces. pushed the pinto into a car in front of him that was stopped to make a left turn, so my insurance paid for two car repairs, In the end the Pinto driver got paid for personal injury from my insurance. He took the money and didn't pay his ambulance bill, so I let the ambulance company know about that and he went straight to collection. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The downsized GM intermediates (particularly the station wagons) were bad in respect to rear impacts too, particularly in areas where cars rusted.  The frames would rot out behind the rear wheels because of the winter slop tossed up by the rear tires, leaving the rear part of the frame separated from the rest.  The Pinto was worse in that it had no "frame" back there.  A book I read about Ford awhile back blamed the design on cost-cutting, or "thrifting", as directed by the guy who was running Ford in that period.  His own book distanced himself from the Pinto, of course.

Where they really screwed up, is when someone at Ford weighed the cost of fixing the design against the estimated number of accident claims, and decided it would be cheaper to pay out the accident claims.  The cost per claim was supposedly based on guidelines established for use after plane crashes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mark said:

The downsized GM intermediates (particularly the station wagons) were bad in respect to rear impacts too, particularly in areas where cars rusted.  The frames would rot out behind the rear wheels because of the winter slop tossed up by the rear tires, leaving the rear part of the frame separated from the rest.  

I seem to recall there was a high profile lawsuit involving a fire from a rear collision w/ a '78-81 Malibu 2dr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, StevenGuthmiller said:

Yet you will still find the Pinto on nearly every "worst car ever built" list. ^_^

 

 

 

Steve

It's amazing that over 3 million were produced over ten years, yet it made the "worst" list. LoL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that the Pinto and the Vegas didn't have their draw backs, but really for a small inexpensive economy car they were pretty good. No matter what kind of vehicle you're driving, if you get hit from behind by something almost twice your size there will be extensive damage, I think it's just simple Physics. When I first started working at a Chevrolet dealership I was given the usual tour of the dealership and the service area. I asked about the neatly stacked engines still in the create from Chevrolet. The stacks were at lease 6 wide and 5 or 6 high. The reply was that they were new warranty engines for the early Vegas.   On the Pinto side of things, a funny story except for the morning motor mouth on the local radio station. This was during the era of histrionics  over exploding Pintos and Firestone 500 tires blowing out at highway speed. The morning radio  programing was sponsored by the local Ford dealer. This one morning Mr. Motor Mouth, thinking that he was entertaining, made some off hand remark about an actual accident in the middle of town that included a Pinto that didn't explode.    He stated that the said Pinto had been running the Red Light when hit it burst into flames and the Firestone tire had exploded. Mr. Motor Mouth wasn't on the radio the next morning and no explanation about his leaving was never given.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, espo said:

Not that the Pinto and the Vegas didn't have their draw backs, but really for a small inexpensive economy car they were pretty good.

I asked about the neatly stacked engines still in the create from Chevrolet. The stacks were at lease 6 wide and 5 or 6 high. The reply was that they were new warranty engines for the early Vegas. 

Doesn't sound very good to me.

A car that's engine warps from the heat and whose body rusts out in less than 2 years wouldn't have been considered even remotely acceptable in my book.

 

 

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Pinto and Vega suffered from their manufacturers' not really wanting to build small cars, because they felt they would make less profit per car with them.  HFII's popular remark was "minicars, miniprofits".  Apparently they felt that younger folks would buy Toyotas and Hondas, then switch to GM, Ford, or Chrysler products when they wanted or needed a bigger car.  Where they whiffed was in thinking that Toyota, Nissan, and Honda would never build bigger or more expensive cars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, StevenGuthmiller said:

Yet you will still find the Pinto on nearly every "worst car ever built" list. ^_^

Steve

The only reason for that is the fuel tank issues. No they were not great cars but they were not the worst cars either. We had 4 at our house that had over 100,000 miles.  Vega's were far worse cars over all around here. When I was in high school in the mid 80's there were more than a few Pinto's in the lot. Not a single Vega still around. While I worked at the gas station in Toledo after school rarely a Vega came in. I worked within a mile of the Hydro-Matic plant. When a Vega would pull in at night, it had a small block under the hood and you never seen that car in the winter or the rain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...