Hawk312 Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 14 hours ago, niteowl7710 said: The other new tool on offer is the Lamborghini Revulto. This kit continues the recent trend of Revell Germany based tools coming "factory prepped" with both LHD & RHD. That Lambo is cool and unexpected. Any release date on that?
Mark Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 7 hours ago, Calb56 said: I also find it interesting in the display model that the side trim is not aligned between the door and body. Looks like the door isn't closed all the way. As for a drag version front axle, the '57 didn't have one when it was first issued. It was added later. The '55 has two engines and a bunch of other optional parts, so no straight axle isn't a big deal.
stavanzer Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Here is the Revell Box Art. And the instructions. You get two engines, a bone stock 265 SB V-8 and a 409 V-8 with twin carbs or a blower. Oddly the drawing of the 409 show it a looking exactly like the engine in the Revell, '53-'54 Sedan Delivery kit. No mag wheels in the original kit, so it looks like Atlantis is adding some. And you get the VHTF "Cal Custom" Hood scoop that most folks seem to want these days. https://public.fotki.com/drasticplasticsmcc/mkiba-build-under-c/revell-instructions/automotive-cars--pi/chevrolet/1951-1960/revell-55-chevy-h-1/?view=roll#1 1
niteowl7710 Posted 14 hours ago Author Posted 14 hours ago 5 hours ago, Zen said: Does the Mustang have 2 sets of mirrors? No there's only one set of mirrors, one set of mirror reflectors which are on the (will be) Chrome tree with the headlight buckets.
Calb56 Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 22 minutes ago, stavanzer said: Here is the Revell Box Art. And the instructions. You get two engines, a bone stock 265 SB V-8 and a 409 V-8 with twin carbs or a blower. Oddly the drawing of the 409 show it a looking exactly like the engine in the Revell, '53-'54 Sedan Delivery kit. No mag wheels in the original kit, so it looks like Atlantis is adding some. And you get the VHTF "Cal Custom" Hood scoop that most folks seem to want these days. https://public.fotki.com/drasticplasticsmcc/mkiba-build-under-c/revell-instructions/automotive-cars--pi/chevrolet/1951-1960/revell-55-chevy-h-1/?view=roll#1 Thanks for the link. I'm pretty stoked to see this back. Oddly, in what research I've done reading Larry Davis' and Don Montgomery's books on gassers the 409 wasn't a common swap for gassers in the 60s. I am excited to see the cal custom scoop back. So, straight axle, wheel well headers and a bit of finaggling you'll get a period gasser... 1
Mark Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago The 409 in the '53-'54 Chevy kits is a simplified crib of the '55 kit's 409. The '53-'54 kits' inner fenders and rear axle look to be copied from the '55 also, and its straight axle setup is copied from the '57 kits. 1
stavanzer Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago (edited) 58 minutes ago, dodgefever said: Surely that isn't going to be the box art? 🤦♂️ You never know.... {and Don't call Me, Shirley!} Edited 13 hours ago by stavanzer 1
Andria H Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago I'll need the Fiero, the LUV, the J10, and all the GM square bodies.
stitchdup Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago was the luv truck an import like the similar size dodge and ford trucks of that era?
stitchdup Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 18 hours ago, niteowl7710 said: The other new tool on offer is the Lamborghini Reveulto. This kit continues the recent trend of Revell Germany based tools coming "factory prepped" with both LHD & RHD. no brakes between the wheel halves is a good move
Rodent Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 12 minutes ago, stitchdup said: was the luv truck an import like the similar size dodge and ford trucks of that era? It was an Isuzu Faster, but I don't know if you got those in Scotland. To answer your question in one word : Yes. 1
Jordan White Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 2 hours ago, Rodent said: It was an Isuzu Faster, but I don't know if you got those in Scotland. To answer your question in one word : Yes. Isuzu and faster, two words that don’t exactly go together!
The Junkman Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago I'll definitely be getting the Mustang for.....reasons. (check my signature). I do notice a lack of "5.0" emblems on the front fenders and wonder if they might be on the chrome tree. Am hoping they do a full detail kit as the 5.0 Coyote is such a integral part of the vehicle. 1
Robberbaron Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago (edited) 15 hours ago, Calb56 said: I don't know much about the Revell version of the 55 Chevy, I believe the exhaust is separate from the chassis as opposed to the AMT version? Which would be nice. I also think it's cool that it includes the proper scoop for earlier gasser versions finally. Though I find it interesting that a straight axle doesn't seem to be available. 7 hours ago, Mark said: the '55 has two engines and a bunch of other optional parts, so no straight axle isn't a big deal. 6 hours ago, Calb56 said: So, straight axle, wheel well headers and a bit of finaggling you'll get a period gasser... You wouldn't know it from the current retro gasser trends, but plenty of gassers were raced back in the sixties WITHOUT straight axles. So it is by no means a necessity in order to build a "period style" gasser. In fact, it looks like the 55 in the pic you posted above doesn't have a straight axle. Couple more random vintage and modern pics: Edited 7 hours ago by Robberbaron
Chris V Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 3 hours ago, Robberbaron said: You wouldn't know it from the current retro gasser trends, but plenty of gassers were raced back in the sixties WITHOUT straight axles. So it is by no means a necessity in order to build a "period style" gasser. What he said! Straight axle swaps were by no means mandatory back in the day. To improve weight transfer and traction many racers simply swapped the front springs with heavy duty station wagon units in order to raise the front end of the car. On other models like 1949-54 Chevies and C1 Corvettes many fitted spacer blocks between the framerails and front suspension crossmember. 1
Mark Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Too, there was another modification to raise the front end. I have seen modified front spindles that add a piece to the outside that extends below the lower control arm, to relocate the wheel attachment point and thus raise the car. The extensions were welded on and add an inch or two to the track width on each side. Those things look extremely sketchy. Some were even used on road going cars, though you might be hard pressed to explain them to an insurance company or the guy inspecting the car. The extended spindles seem to have been a Midwestern fad, maybe at "outlaw" or unsanctioned drag strips. I wouldn't even use them in a model build unless I were trying to replicate a particular car that was otherwise cool.
Calb56 Posted 36 minutes ago Posted 36 minutes ago 3 hours ago, Chris V said: What he said! Straight axle swaps were by no means mandatory back in the day. To improve weight transfer and traction many racers simply swapped the front springs with heavy duty station wagon units in order to raise the front end of the car. On other models like 1949-54 Chevies and C1 Corvettes many fitted spacer blocks between the framerails and front suspension crossmember. I didn't mean to hijack this thread. I know that building a historically correct "gasser" didn't mean the same as current "gasser style" which seems to be closer related to the earlier "street freak" style than early gassers. I am excited about the possibility of this without ANT's molded in exhaust and the possibility of the scribed rear wheel wells to help things along. It has a lot of potential and I'm glad to see it returning.
Chris V Posted 27 minutes ago Posted 27 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, Calb56 said: I didn't mean to hijack this thread. I know that building a historically correct "gasser" didn't mean the same as current "gasser style" which seems to be closer related to the earlier "street freak" style than early gassers. I am excited about the possibility of this without ANT's molded in exhaust and the possibility of the scribed rear wheel wells to help things along. It has a lot of potential and I'm glad to see it returning. Speaking from experience you're better off installing the rear axle/suspension for positive location of the centre of the radius to clear the slicks. On this model I've even replaced the Chevy axle with a modified Olds/Pontiac rear axle out of Revell's "Beatnik Bandit" Showrod:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now