Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

1/25 AMT 1971 Mustang Mach 1


Casey

Recommended Posts

Rex and Spike,

I wasn't a fan of the front and rear ends on the '71 when it came out, but I didn't like the '70's front end either.  They have really grown on me.  Both of your cars are really sharp.  I grew up in Dearborn and saw my first Mustang in December of '63 driving in my subdivision - which was four months before it was unveiled at the 1964 World's Fair.  My favorite is the '69 Mach 1 and Boss 429, followed by the '65 and '66 2+2 fastback.  My biology teacher was a part-time salesman at a local Ford dealer for a while, dating the owner's daughter.  He had a yellow '70 Torino GT, then got a lime '71 Mach 1!

 

Edited by Motor City
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ads like this had a major impact on my love for the '71 Mustangs when they first came out. I though they were great looking cars the first time I saw them. And then Bond driving a basically an identical car in Diamonds are Forever. Frosting on the cake. I like the Mach I without the optional stripes, like seen in the ad below or the Bond movie. At the same time, I hope if Round 2 releases the Bond Mustang, I hope they give the option of the stripes on the decal sheet. I may not use them. But, I like option of using them if I wanted to. 

By the way, Diamonds are Forever is still one of my favorite Bond films for more than just the Mustang. In August of 1970 on a family vacation, I got to see Las Vegas for the first time. Being under age, only 12 at the time, I was too young to go in any casino other than Circus Circus. So the Bond movie the next year not only showed a cool car I loved, but the version of Vegas I was first exposed to. And influence by. With many scenes filmed at Circus Circus. How cool was that? 

So I really do hope Round 2 does for sure do the Bond Mustang. But, please Round 2, do it right and don't give us another MPC Boss 351 based on the '73 kit. 

 

IMG_4159.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/6/2020 at 11:09 AM, unclescott58 said:

I really hope this is not the rehash of the old MPC '71 Boss 351 kit. And it will have a correct front end on it. Not just the bumper, but the headlamp bezels/area too. Though being the sucker I am for the '71 and '72 Mach I, and a Bond fan to boot, I'm sure I'll be buying this one no matter what. And I do like the box art shown above, if nothing else. 

The problem is the ERTL 1971 reissue was a luke warm 1973. They kept the 1973 5mph bumper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Bob Ellis said:

The problem is the ERTL 1971 reissue was a luke warm 1973. They kept the 1973 5mph bumper.

I think a bunch of us here have already mentioned that. If you go back and read the other posts here, you'll see that the bumper is not the only problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/15/2020 at 8:57 AM, unclescott58 said:

I think a bunch of us here have already mentioned that. If you go back and read the other posts here, you'll see that the bumper is not the only problem. 

 

On 6/15/2020 at 8:57 AM, unclescott58 said:

I think a bunch of us here have already mentioned that. If you go back and read the other posts here, you'll see that the bumper is not the only problem. 

Has the wrong mufflers too. MIssing -Link was selling the correct small bumper and even chromed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
24 minutes ago, vamach1 said:

Isn't that the truth.

For as long as the Torino has been in their arsenal, one would think that if a Cyclone based on it was coming out that it would have happened a long time ago. I too would like to see modern kits of the Mustang and Cyclone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/6/2020 at 4:19 PM, 64Comet404 said:

Please Round 2, give us a new ‘71-3 Mustang kit! The MPC kit tooling deserves to be retired and sent to the nearest smelter, and the AMT kit would need too much work to return to stock. 

This subject ('71/'72 Mustang Mach 1/'71 Boss 351) was reportedly on the new tool list of one of the domestic kitmakers as of about 15 years ago.  Apparently never made it high enough on the list for tooling.  Too bad, this generation (the '71/-72, not so much the '73) is on my list of all time favorite Mustangs....TIM 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tim boyd said:

This subject ('71/'72 Mustang Mach 1/'71 Boss 351) was reportedly on the new tool list of one of the domestic kitmakers as of about 15 years ago.  Apparently never made it high enough on the list for tooling.  Too bad, this generation (the '71/-72, not so much the '73) is on my list of all time favorite Mustangs....TIM 

I heard that also from a reliable source at the NNL in Toledo  last year too.  I think the overkill or Eleanor and Bullitt’s and to some degree the 69 and 70 kits that have been improved in many ways especially the interiors and engines and chassis accuracy.  Even with a bunch of better or new resin grilles and bumper and engines and factory decals it is still a chore to make either the almost 50 year old AMT and MPC kits of the 71-73 (sportsroof only of course) Mustang into an accurate representation of the one of the fastest of the showroom Mustangs of the early 70’s that handled pretty well too.

Edited by vamach1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/6/2020 at 9:04 PM, 1972coronet said:

An all-new 1971 BOSS 351 ( 429 SCJ option ? ) with period-correct aftermarket speed equipment would be quite nice . Heck , throw-in a 1973 fascia for those whom wish to build the original Elanor !

And the Standard hood (which Eleanor had) to do that version of maybe a sprint or plain sportsroof.  The interior buckets are atrocious in the AMT and MPC offerings if one wants to represent the deluxe door panels.  The gauge cluster and dash are okay but Including a mini console for an automatic shift selector for a FMX or C6 trannyI  would be nice but I could go on and on but let’s just say the list of what could be included is petty long.

With just the right hood, grille, Front bumper, side mirrors,  and decals at least a 72 sprint could be built with either Magnum 500’s or the FOMOCO hubcap and trim rings on stock steel wheels.  I know it would save builder the expense of custom decals, extra resin parts and pilfering a set of wheels front the spares box.  I don’t think that is asking for much after the builder finds a suitable engine for the kit such as the 302.

 

38A9B1EE-E57B-4BB4-A6CD-EA7CD5B3A26C.jpeg

Edited by vamach1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last time I had one of those (yucky) MPC 1971-1973 Mustang kits was the c.1986 reissue ( 1971 BOSS 351 ) ---- back in 1987 . I never got close to finishing it ; just a lump o' dung . I used its engines in other projects , and its wheels on another .

I drove my friend's 1972 Mach 1 from Riverside to Gardena ( one end of the 91 freeway to the other end ) . It ran quite good ; lots of power from its 2Bbl Cleveland . Soon as we got to his dad's house in Gardena , the thing boiled-over , puking coolant all over the driveway ----- temp gauge didn't indicate its running hot (?!?) . My friend's dad came unglued , admonishing my friend in Japanese ! Haha ! After the harangue , his dad turned to me , bowed , then apologised --in English-- for the "show" .  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 1972coronet said:

The last time I had one of those (yucky) MPC 1971-1973 Mustang kits was the c.1986 reissue ( 1971 BOSS 351 ) ---- back in 1987 . I never got close to finishing it ; just a lump o' dung . I used its engines in other projects , and its wheels on another .

I drove my friend's 1972 Mach 1 from Riverside to Gardena ( one end of the 91 freeway to the other end ) . It ran quite good ; lots of power from its 2Bbl Cleveland . Soon as we got to his dad's house in Gardena , the thing boiled-over , puking coolant all over the driveway ----- temp gauge didn't indicate its running hot (?!?) . My friend's dad came unglued , admonishing my friend in Japanese ! Haha ! After the harangue , his dad turned to me , bowed , then apologised --in English-- for the "show" .  

Great story.  I’ve had my 72 Mach1 for 39 years so needless to say there’s a lot of stories of various escapades in it a few of which meant a visit to the County Courthouse a few times for traffic court.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought my ex girlfriend a red '73 convertible with the Mach 1 stripe package and hood.... She told me it was impractical so I sold it and got her a blue '72 Pinto with a 4-speed... ?? 

The Mustang looked something like this but it had the dog dish caps and trim rings....

1973-ford-mustang-convertible-is-a-one-in-a-million-barn-find-143649_1.jpg

Edited by Deuces ll
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/6/2020 at 9:25 PM, vamach1 said:

And the Standard hood (which Eleanor had) to do that version of maybe a sprint or plain sportsroof.  The interior buckets are atrocious in the AMT and MPC offerings if one wants to represent the deluxe door panels.  The gauge cluster and dash are okay but not having the mini console for an automatic shift selector for a FMX or C6 tranny would be nice.   I could go on and on but let’s just say the list of what could be included is petty long.

With just the right hood, grille, Front bumper, side mirrors,  and decals at least a 72 sprint could be built with either Magnum 500’s or the FOMOCO hubcap and trim rings on stock steel wheels.  I know it would save builder the expense of custom decals, extra resin parts and pilfering a set of wheels front the spares box.  I don’t think that is asking for much after the builder finds a suitable engine for the kit such as the 302.

 

38A9B1EE-E57B-4BB4-A6CD-EA7CD5B3A26C.jpeg

I would like to build that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...