Robberbaron

The MPC Monza bodies are by far the most accurate, and most people still don't care much about the promos. About 2 years ago I scored a mint condition red one for $10 (two-fer deal with a '78 Monte promo, $20 for the pair). Also just got one of the AMT reissues on Friday from Spotlight Hobbies on closeout. Body doesn't look quite as accurate as the MPCs, but I haven't compared them side by side yet. However, it does have separate drivetrain and exhaust. Also a nice platform-type interior with two different dashes and steering wheels. If you want to build a nice, full detail Monza, I think the way to go is to use an MPC promo body combined with everything else from the AMT kit. From what I've seen of the Revell, it's not worth much more than the cost of the plastic it's molded in.

When the Moebius '65 Belvedere sedan came out, Tim Boyd did a comparison to several other kit bodies, including the Lindberg Dodge, on his Fotki site. His comments focused mainly on the roof of the Lindberg: https://public.fotki.com/funman1712/first-look-at-all-n/new-moebius-65-plym-1/new-moebius-65-plym/?view=roll#2 As for why most of us originally didn't hear too much commentary about the many inaccuracies, I suspect much of it has to do with the original release of this kit occurring before internet usage had become widespread. I'm sure many people familiar with the 1:1 cars saw the problems instantly, but at the time there wasn't a method to instantly share those observations with thousands of people worldwide, including with comparison photos. In my opinion, a similar situation has occurred with the AMT 68-69 Roadrunner and GTX kits. Lots of legitimate gripes about the bodies in those kits, but I sure don't remember hearing about those problems when those kits were originally released. It may also have something to do with the 1:1 subject being a little more uncommon than many other subjects. While a '64 Dodge 330 may not qualify as a "rare" car, it certainly isn't as common as something like a 67-69 Camaro or Tri-Five Chevy, which you're likely to see at almost any large cruise night. So I suspect that many people, even if they liked the kit and bought one, might not have been familiar enough with the 1:1 subject to actually spot most of the problems.

Mine was.

Aren't the 428 and 455 the only other blocks with the big journals?

Wow, that's in incredible condition for an original issue, down to the intact hood ornament! I built a reissue version from the "Customizing Series", probably around '88? Sprayed it in Testors metallic blue with a white interior. (Back then, when I did a white interior EVERYTHING got spayed Testors flat white, including dash and floor) It's on my eventual rebuild list. With the promo-style chassis, there's really not that many parts to blow apart and reassemble. Wouldn't mind getting another one of these kits. If you're building it box stock, it can be a quick and dirty slump buster.

Proportionophilia? ?

Got another Moebius '61 Catalina from my LHS last week. Then stopped at Hobby Lobby yesterday to see if they had gotten any more of the Revell '85 442 kits: nope. Also haven't gotten in any more of the stock '70 Chargers. Luckily I got one of each the one time I saw them, starting to think that was my first and last chance. My LHS guy said they're both on back order for him. I hate to be one of those guys, but I'm going into the mode of "better get some of these Revell kits that I've been on the fence about". Since I had a 40% coupon, I decided I'd get a SnapTite '57 Bel Air, just to get the American Racing Salt Flat wheels. I can picture those on a lot of potential projects, and I figure I may need to start casting some for myself. I've debated getting one of these kits for years, but until recently it seemed like it would be available forever (and for cheap). Now, there's no telling.

Man, that is impressive work! Never noticed the weird contours of the rear window opening until I saw you posting, but sure enough, you got it right. Did you source the hub caps from a '68 Impala promo? I don't know of any other source for those.

I agree: the Motor Max diecast is by far the cheapest alternative, $9.99 at my local Walmarts. Far from perfect, but seems pretty good proportionally, to me. For the bigger trucks, Ertl made a '57 Chevy 8400 stake truck in a whole bunch of different versions. I know you were originally asking about '58 or '59, but I figured this may be of interest. I believe it's a actually 1/25. These pop up quite a bit on eBay and can sometimes be had for mid-$20s in decent condition. I recently picked one up for less than $20 that had some play damage (missing mirrors and fender lights, and a broken leaf spring)

That's EXACTLY what they should be doing. Anything 1/24 brand as Monogram, anything 1/25 brand as Revell. Easy way to differentiate the brands and also let consumers instantly know what they're getting. After the whole bankruptcy thing gets sorted out, maybe the new ownership will have a better clue regarding how to brand and market their product.

I had the same reaction when I first saw it. Even though Round 2 is reproducing the vintage box art, it's a pretty lousy depiction of the '65 front end. It does look more like a '64/'65 mashup....

To each their own. For many of the Round 2 reissues that I couldn't care less about, there are others on this forum that are overjoyed, and vice-versa. I personally don't have any warm and fuzzy feelings for the box art, and never had an original "Polyglas Gasser" Bonneville kit. However, for me the kit was a great value because of all the custom parts and the three full sets of tires. The box was noticeably heavier than the average kit, and it was absolutely packed full once I got the box open. I was actually a little scared that some parts would be warped because it was so tight, but it seems like all's good.

Looks like it got 2 black eyes. At least they're using the Monogram name correctly, on a 1/24 classic Monogram kit.

The only question is: should it be aqua, pink, or peach? ? There used to be a monochrome peach colored 1980 El Camino (flat front) stomping around my hometown in about 1991, complete with limo-tinted windows and "chaos" graphics...

Wow! This is BY FAR my favorite build so far of this kit! You've pretty much improved or eliminated all of the Foose gimmicks that I disliked from the box stock version. Seeing this actually makes me consider getting one of these after all...

You here that? That's the bottom of the barrel getting scraped... C'mon Round 2: You mean to tell me that there's more demand for this than the 1959 Imperial or the 1964 Comet? Or even reissue one of the '90s Chevy C1500 or Ford F-150 kits before this, at least there's some interest in those. You guys still have all sorts of stuff that would sell better than this...

Guess it was big Pontiac week for me. My LHS finally got in the stock Moebius '61 Catalinas, so I got one of those (been looking forward to that one since they announced it). Then stopped at Hobby Lobby the other day and got the AMT '62 Catalina "Polyglass Gasser II". I already have a couple of the original issue stock kits, so I really didn't NEED one of those, but Round 2 gilded the lily well enough to get me to buy it for the custom parts/wheels/tires. I need to start finding a new way of hiding all these kits from my wife...

X2 About half the time that I start responding to a thread, as I'm typing I will then realize that I really don't have anything productive to say, so I delete it. This also often applies when I'm tempted to post a smart-a$$ response. Sometimes just typing the words is cathartic enough that you don't need to actually hit "submit", as long as you have impulse control. If you don't have anything nice to say...

I much prefer that an older thread be continued rather than starting a new one on the exact same subject, especially kit reviews and such. As stated, some of the older content can be invaluable, especially from members who are no longer with us. Consider that Round 2 is reissuing many kits that were previously reissued about 10 years ago. If a thread from 2008 already exists for the same basic kit (tool), doesn't it make more sense to continue that original thread, with further commentary/comparison with the new 2018 release? Among everything else that Harry did for the forum, he was very diligent about combining threads when multiples of the same subject popped up. Some other previous moderators were also very on top of this. That's not a dig at the current moderators, it had to take an awful lot of time to do it effectively, and I don't think I would be able to do it, myself. What infuriates me is 3 different ongoing threads started in the kit review section, for the exact same subject. Either because people were either too lazy or too ignorant to look further down the page or, God forbid, go to page 2 to see if there was an existing thread on the subject.

Sounds like a nice setup. My daily driver is also a white '06 Sierra that I bought new. Mine is a standard cab longbed, bought it as a Worktruck, but have upgraded it with a chrome grille, chrome rear bumper, chrome side moldings, etc. Aside from the regular cab and 8 ft bed, it pretty much looks like yours, except I replaced the W/T steelies with Denali 6-spoke rims. I always planned to do some additional mods, but I got married a year after buying it, then house/wife/kids ate up most of the previous free time. It's turned out to be a pretty bulletproof daily driver, though. I'm at 113K and the 4.8 still doesn't burn a drop of oil. Aside from routine maintenance, the only real annoyance has been blowing several brake lines due to road salt, since I'm in the heart of the rust belt.

The Revell kit has the upper grille trim correctly molded as a separate piece, to install on the hood. On the AMT it is just molded together with the grille assembly. I don't see any problem with the A-pillars on either of the '67 kits. The Lindberg '66 Chevelle is the kit that has the too thick A-pillars.

Notice this illustration shows the incorrect 1971 grille/headlight doors, like the old glue kit. Please tell me that the new tool snap Charger has the correct 1969 grille pattern and this is just an illustration mistake. Otherwise, why bother getting one of these?

Just right! Sure don't see too many of these built and posted anymore.

Back when they were still common daily drivers, I used to occasionally see the big mid-seventies Ford LTDs running Buick Road Wheels from the big Buicks, which always seemed really "wrong" to me, even as a kid. (To be honest, even now it kinda bothers me to see them on anything besides a Buick, even other GM brands.) Think there were quite a few different FoMoCo cars that used 5 on 5, probably for the same reason GM did on all their 71-76 GM full-sized: cars were just getting so huge at that time.

That mall has everything...