Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

StevenGuthmiller

Members
  • Posts

    14,973
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by StevenGuthmiller

  1. I agree. I think that the guys at Round-2 have much better opportunities, and I hope better sense, than to pursue something like that. I'm sorry Patrick. I had no intentions of hijacking your thread. I was simply answering a direct question asked by yourself, and then addressing the couple of suggestions that followed. Steve
  2. Apparently he also has the uncanny and enviable ability to walk and chew gum at the same time. Steve
  3. Nope, checked those too. Might be a suitable starting point, but would still require modification. Steve
  4. Oh geez, lighten up. It’s Patrick’s thread. I think he’s perfectly capable of policing it all by himself. Or you can start “your” own thread and moderate it however you see fit. Steve
  5. Different style of seat entirely. The seats from the Monogram ‘70 Buick GSX are pretty close, but unfortunately the wrong scale. Steve
  6. I have one, but have yet to build it. When I do it, it’s going to require a considerable amount of work. I will of course be doing a full detail build with a chassis swap and a fully detailed engine bay, not to mention changes to the interior and badging to depict a J-Model instead of an SJ. Thar will require a new seat upholstery pattern. I need to do some checking, as I believe that the J-Model ‘69 GP shared it’s seats with some of the other GM cars from that era. Maybe the ‘69/‘70 GTO or Chevelle? I don’t know for sure. Model-J Model-SJ Steve
  7. Depends on how well they run their organization I suppose. ? Steve
  8. First of all, there's no such thing as a good looking pimp mobile! Steve
  9. In full disclosure, I have to confess that my disdain for this Super Fly “thing” stems from the fact that I own a 1:1 1969 Pontiac Grand Prix, and to see it disrespected in this fashion is a bit more than my sensibilities can withstand. It is a beautiful and unique design, and to see it transformed from an elegant and innovative “muscle car” into this ridiculous caricature makes me more than a little bit nauseous. No doubt that a bug eyed, grotesque version of a ‘70 Mustang or ‘67 Corvette would likewise rub the lovers of those cars the wrong way as well. Steve
  10. I still wouldn’t buy it, but I can understand why people would. The pimp mobile on the other hand?.......yeah, no. ? Steve
  11. Good lord! I rest my case. ? Steve
  12. I suppose whatever floats people’s boats, but if this is the kit, I’ll save my money and buy some cool stuff from Fireball Modelworks, M.A.D. and MCW. ? Steve
  13. Yes. One just as grotesque as the other. ? Steve
  14. I suppose, but then again, there’s not much point to the whole thread. All just speculation and an opportunity to express our individual wish lists, whatever value there is to that. Seams to me that the only real value of a thread based entirely on fantasy is that it might elicit some thoughts and opinions, and my opinion is that any “one trick pony” is quite possibly destined for failure. I doubt that I’m the only one that doesn’t have any interest in a kit that doesn’t offer any build options. It might be of some interest to Round-2 to know if their new venture is going to be a bomb or not, so a few opinions might be of some value. But then again, what do I know. ? I’ll be the first to admit that whenever I see one of the Foose Cadillacs on a contest table or on a forum or group, I don’t even give it a second look, but my assumption is that Revell sold quite a few of them. Steve
  15. I have to say, that if it was the “Super Fly” Grand Prix, what a huge disappointment that would be!!!! To bring back that abomination and not the stock ‘72 Grand Prix would be a real kick in the head! It’s for that reason that I have strong doubts about that possibility. Steve
  16. The swap should go well. I used the MPC, (AMT) ‘69 chassis and most of the engine under the Johan ‘68 with almost no issues at all. I’m not 100% sure of the engine colors in ‘70, but in ‘68, the 350 was gold, and the 400 was bronze. The same goes for ‘69 with the addition of the 455, which was red. Steve
  17. That’s pretty much it. ? Steve
  18. Fortunately, we as modelers have many different tools and materials at our disposal, and this is just one. Give it a try some time. It may be for you, it may not. Steve
  19. I use Micro-Mesh pads and Novus polish, with a little Turtle Wax "Scratch and Swirl Remover" at the end. I know that a lot of builders look for ways to apply paint to avoid any polishing, which is just great. But my opinion is that even a shiny paint job can benefit from some polishing. To my eye, raw paint can often have a "hard candy" appearance that can sometimes make a model look like a model instead of something closer to the real thing. After all, the absolute best automotive painters still "cut and polish" their projects before they go out the door. As far as I know, yellowing isn't a problem with Duplicolor clear. I have several models in white that are at least 8 to 10 years old, and there is no signs of yellowing. Steve
  20. Well, It's not air brushable, (unless you want to decant it) and it's only usable over lacquer, but I use nothing but Duplicolor "Clear Protective Top Coat". I love the stuff because it sprays on so nicely, with great control with the fan spray nozzle, and goes on so thin that multiple coats are possible, which allows for polishing depth without hiding detail, and it dries to a very tough, durable finish. It's not initially as glossy as some other clear coats, but it polishes out to a very smooth, shiny and realistic looking finish. I routinely use as many as 5 coats of the stuff, right out of the spray can, without any detail hide. Steve
  21. I know what I'll build, and what I won't, so I won't pretend that I'll be excited about something that doesn't interest me. I know I won't buy it, unless it's something that has enough stock parts that it can be built stock with the addition of parts from other kits, such as chassis and engine, and enough of an interior that it can be kit bashed and scratch built back to stock. And even then, it would have to be a subject that excites me. A custom Vette won't cut it for me. At this point in my modeling career, I have more than enough stuff in my stash that'll just sit there until I decide to get rid of it. Steve
  22. Agree completely. As soon as I heard that there was no factory stock option, I was out, regardless of what it is. Steve
  23. Thanks Wayne. Don’t worry, I have plenty of mojo. Just not enough time! ? Steve
  24. They look a little like ‘64 Pontiac Grand Prix lenses, but they seem a little too short. Steve
×
×
  • Create New...