Jon Cole

ARRR! So I have just ONE more plug hole to drill... snap the drill bit! Good thing I have spares. Not THAT size.... But I do have spares. Poop. Oh well.

Thanks for bringing this to our attention, Steve!

Perhaps they already did. Perhaps they didn't find what they were looking for. Who are we to judge?

Well, there goes your "Witness Protection" cover.

This could turn into a slippery subject

Your're not a true Ohana until you run around your block wearing just a lei...

Wicked! Not another run-of-the-mill model!

Steve- luv that 57 Chebby!

SCRAPE! This may be available in resin? If not, it should be. Dodge '68 or '69 'Topless' Charger...

I'll try to add pics of stuff that may be possible in scale...

It's just a personal collection! I never claimed it had everything! And I never saw that movie... and that pic does nothing to change my mind! :unsure:

Really? I would say that the rear right definitely went into the wall, impacting with enough force to cause some flex to the rear axle assembly. Enough so that if it had no effect, it would be one heck of a coincidence

This guy found out the hard way! http://carscoop.blogspot.com/2011/09/video-chevy-camaro-dragster-rear-axle.html

I thought this should be passed along... as found on another site: Moebius Hudson Instruction sheet errors Posted By: Dave Metzner <dmetzner47@comcast.net> Date: Monday, 26 September 2011, at 6:44 p.m. There are two errors on the instruction sheet for the 1953 Hudson Coupe kit.. The part number call outs for the vent window glass are transposed as are the numbers for the Side view mirrors - these errors have been corrected already for any future issues of the kit - including the Tim Flock version..

Over 1300 pics, arranged alphabetically. If you don't find what you seek, I may have listed it under diff. title. Example: General Lee may be listed as such, or as "Dukes..." Oh, if you find blanks with a red "X", that's just Fotki losing my photos. Wish I could recommend them, but I can't. http://public.fotki.com/JCole/11_celebrity_rides/

They're coming. By the thousands. Be prepared.

Goes like heck... until it slams into the first thing the driver fails to see.

Why ruin the model?!

Chalk me up for a "boring" ol' stock version. Blue, just like on the box. Just like the 1:1 around here.

Well not 14... a few didn't come out. At least I got my "Albert Wallace style" pic...

I took these pics of a 2010 Lonestar out of Quebec a few days ago. I asked the driver if he wouldn’t mind if I took a few photos of his truck… he hops over to me wearing one sneaker(?) Says he lost his other sneaker at his last delivery up the road. “How did you do that?” He said he always drives in his stocking feet. So rather than trying to turn that around in the middle of a small town, I gave him a lift to his last stop. Not there. We try a dirt pull-off about ½ mile up the road, and lo and behold, a sneaker is there! So he got his sneaker, and I got my pics. This is the first Lonestar I have seen stopped. Quite an impressive rig! Hope these pics are useful for someone. More in the next post.... FIVE pic MAX per post? OMG... it will take me hours to post 14 pics!

I could try that w/ the company van, but instead of turbo whine, it would go "BOOM", then dead silence. Except for me... laughing.

The #1 recipe for disappointment is to walk in to a contest with the attitude of winning. Even Charlie Sheen lost with that attitude. I would much rather win something, never expecting it, than vice versa. Often, it's the newbies. People who have never been to a contest, and probably never been exposed to things like this forum.

Well, I would NOT call these "reference" photos.,,, that would be a complete photo study of a vehicle. Exterior, interior, engine bay, chassis, trunk, and detail shots. Photos to help us detail a model. I don't call one photo of a particular vehicle much of a reference. At least that's my opinion on it