The minute I find time to work on a model, I'm having fun. Something about this hobby brings back my childhood like nothing else. I do enjoy adding a few important (to me) details, but a lot of later-tooled kits provide a VERY satisfying right-outta-da-box sort of build. Overall presentation is key; as one of my painting professors used to say, '"I don't care how well you paint the eye, I don't care if you think you can paint every eyelash; if you can't get it in the right location on the face, you have lost the likeness, and the whole portrait." So it goes with models, more details don't necessarily mean better model; first you gotta conquer the basics. Someone else here mentioned Tim Boyd's building style, and Tim's articles and models were an inspiration for me as well when I got back into this hobby in the early 90s. His cars focused on an overall concept, and he sweated the stance to get just the look he wanted. I like that approach. A good sketch beats a bad painting every time! It's easy to get swept up with the wealth of resources we have available to us today. It's hard to not want. I have to remind myself to keep it fun, too. I love seeing a well crafted, scratch built model that is nearly indiscernible from real, and can respect the craftsman that made it, but that ain't me, and never will be. I have a couple of Impala projects under construction that I hope to make realistic, but not enough to fool anyone! I'm having fun with them, and if were a Dave Deal Glitterbug, or a Horten 229, it would feel the same to me. It must be that way for most of us; look at the views of a good build thread - it doesn't have to be the latest and greatest kit, a zillion modelers will check in to see another Monogram Bad Man kit built! (AS THEY SHOULD)