Ace-Garageguy

Just beautiful...

Beautiful. And boy, do I miss being out there.

Who said anything about responses had to be actual sentences, anyhow?

Yeah, there still seems to be a deficiency in complying with the "sentence" part of the one-sentence-game rules...but not everyone cares anyway.

I think it's impossible to make a blanket statement about AMT kits, as they're all over the board in terms of accuracy, complexity, "buildability", and general quality. The annuals from the early 1960s, being developed from factory blueprints, usually have very accurate bodies and actually look exactly like what they're supposed to represent...but the chassis are simplified blobs. On the other hand, the classic '32 Ford roadster from the same period (and AMT's other '32s developed from the same basic tooling) have serious body dimensional errors in the height of the cowl that require major work to correct. The AMT '34 Ford 3-window is, in my opinion, one of the worst kits ever, bearing very little resemblance to a real one, with many of the parts looking like they came from a toy designed by people in some foreign land who had never seen anything but blurry Xeroxed photos of what they were trying to represent. AMT's much later '34 Ford 5-window is really pretty decent, though it has its share of scaling errors, but their '33 Ford sedan (that shares its chassis and engine with the 5-window kit) has annoying body scaling and proportion issues. Bottom line: if you want to avoid disappointment, research the particular kit you're interested in. Look at multiple sources, as not everything you'll read on the internet is true. In particular, consult sites like this one, and look at what other competent modelers have to say about a kit, and what they've been able to accomplish with it. And remember that there are whiners who routinely bad-mouth anything that doesn't assemble itself, so take whatever you see with a grain of salt.

"Done and dusted" is British idiomatic English meaning "completely finished".

Pork jalfrezi, not quite as eye-watering hot as my version of vindaloo. https://ericaobrien.com/jalfrezi-vs-vindaloo-comparison-guide/ Basmati rice with peas, toasted and buttered onion pita bread, and sweet chutney...all washed down with a pretty decent California Pinot noir. Unadorned fresh blackberries for dessert.

Cost in wasted time, buggered fasteners, broken or dull drill bits, and non-warrantied tool failures usually offsets any money "saved" by buying 3-rd rate garbage to work with.

These quizzes are great web-search skill builders. As I explained to Michael, I'd never seen this one before... "but as bizarre as it is, I figured it was either Soviet-era Russian, or from the American Budd company, that made corrugated stainless-steel-sided railroad passenger cars. An image search of "Soviet prototype car" brought up a picture and a name, and a little more digging identified it as a REAF-50, built at the Riga Experimental Factory in 1950. https://justacarguy.blogspot.com/2022/01/in-rigas-museum-but-since-i-dont-read.html https://philseed.com/riga-motor-museum-latvia/"

Trash tools are generally made for markets that shop price first, and have little understanding of or demand for quality.

My peeps don't come around much since the aftereffects of the "nothing to worry about, folks...move along" chemical spill left them a little, uh, different.

Yup, this'll be cool.

You do NOT need to complete your profile in order to get 100% functionality of the site. AND NO ADDITIONAL "MANUALS" NOR ANYTHING ELSE IS REQUIRED TO USE THIS FORUM. Do NOT be suckered into clicking on any of that rubbish. Do NOT download ANYTHING. Unfortunately, some advertising is allowed here to cover expenses, and it can be intrusive and in some cases scam-based. The management tries to limit the advertising intrusiveness, but it's continually evolving and often defeats whatever limits are put in place...for which you can thank Google in large part. You can eliminate seeing popups and ad gibberish covering posts by employing an ad-blocking extension for your browser. Some of us have expressed a willingness to pay for access to the site in order to offset the need for revenue from intrusive advertising, but nothing has happened on that front so far.

Concept cars appeal to me much more than most boring production vehicles.

"Are opinions distinguishable from facts?" is the position of the fuzzy thinkers who have no use for objective reality.

Oh, the humanity !!!

It really depends on exactly what kind of "fiberglass" you want to represent, as there are many colors depending on what resin is used, and part thickness. Old-school polyester is often "that yellowish color", but depending on a variety of factors, can be dark yellow/brown, dark brown, and greenish yellow or dark green. SMC (sheet molding compound) that raw Corvette OEM body panels are made from may be light to dark gray, uncoated floor panels are frequently (but not always) "that yellowish color" again, with aftermarket stuff coming in a wide variety of colored gelcoats or tinted resins too. When epoxy is the resin system (as opposed to polyester), very light green to dark green is most prevalent, sometimes light blue or even colorless, while vinyl-ester resins tend toward the brown scale. If you want to model a composite part accurately, it's good to research your particular application.

Yup.

I build in-scale what I'd build for myself in full-scale if I had Bill Gates' money. Pretty simple really.

Remember the meaning of this special day: chocolate bunnies, hunting decorated eggs, and gorging at lunch. I hope that's religion-free enough to avoid arousing the ire of the perpetually offended.

They do indeed look good. I believe you've got this.

Invention is great when it solves a physical problem in the real world, not so great when it makes up and propagates "alternative facts".