unclescott58

Is BVD an authorized Mopar aftermarket accessory? I thought to be correct it had to be Fruit of the Loom or Jocky? Which ever one soaks up the gas best, can be lit easily, and not be detected easily by the fire marshals or insurance investigators. ? Scott

An RX-7 may end up in my collection too. Scott

Glad to see the '70 Charger and '76 Torino in stock form. Those two move on to my must have list. Scott

Your gas cap looks better that the one that came with the real car. But... it's not factory correct!? Scott

Another great review Hpiguy. I subscribe and follow you on YouTube. But, still it's great to see you linked up back here too. Keep them coming. I love your enthusiasm. You always sound pretty excited as you review most kits. And I like your realistic views on what the hobby should be about. Having fun! Scott

Going back and rereading things a little closer, I'm very disappointed that the Revell announcement about the Cobra Coupe is an April Fools Joke. In fact I'm more than disappointed. I'm bit pissed. What a mean thing to do. Scott

I have no problem with that. Just want to may sure others know what is "factory correct." But, as far as building the way you like it. I say go for it. Scott

And your point is? Your right I didn't read any of the posts in this thread until today. Then I decided to make my comment on it. What's wrong with that? Scott

1980 had the "goofy" cap. 1976 did not. Scott

Go look on the web. Look at the sales brochure. My factory salesman's feature book mentions it. The "goofy" gas cap in the kit is the correct one. Like it or not. Scott

Very cool that Revell is coming out with the Shelby Coupe. I didn't know about this until now. It now on my must have list. I look forward to adding it to my collection this fall. Scott

That "goofy" fuel gap in the kit is correct for the 1980 Roadrunner in real life. Scott

I vote for the Riv. Make mine a. '72. Scott

Interesting to note. The box for the wagon version does state that is a "'52 Custom Wagon." I'm guessing that's how they explain the car as having only two-doors and the exact same interior as the Fleetline kit. It is obvious the only difference between the two kits is the center body section with the roof. Pyro was saving some tooling expenses in doing a variation off of the '52 Fleetline kit. I'm sure they thought that most kids did not know that Chevrolet did not offer a two-door wagon at the time. Or would care. And if they did. Like I point out, it states that it is a Custom Wagon right on the box. Scott

Oh wow! I'm sad to hear about this. And yet I believe he's now in a better place. Bless you Harry. You will be missed by us for now, who are still here. Scott

Interesting thread. It makes me rethink whether I really want a wagon kit or not? If Round 2 Lindberg chose to reissue it, or I could pickup an unmolested one, I probably would. But, knowing what I know now, I'm not going to go out of my way to hunt one down. Scott

Waiting for Stroker McGlurk. Scott

Dito. That would be cool. Scott

Another one I built recently. Again not a bad kit. I just had to fill in the lines for the t-top. Because I have never liked t-tops. Built AMT's '68 Roadrunner at the same time, in the same color combinations. For bookend Roadrunners. Scott

Just built the Lindberg Chevy 2-door a few weeks ago. Over all not a bad kit. I had fun with it. The model seems a little small for 1/32 scale. But that's okay. I'd love to find the station wagon. Scott

Another great review. As you know, I too love these losers. Keep them coming. Scott

Very kool. Scott

Wow! Very cool. Scott

Very nice. I can smell the salt air. Scott

Nice job. Always fun to see this type of kit. I love them. Scott