Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Luc Janssens

Members
  • Posts

    3,460
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Luc Janssens

  1. They were in the past (except Moebius that is)
  2. Pure speculation on my part, but the reason too that Tamiya didn't include an engine in their kit, could be that they feared they could've been priced out of the north American market, if Revell would've tooled up a new kit of it, remember this kit was in the works before Hobbico imploded. And the American market in this case seems of importance cuz the kit will be released here first...
  3. Round2 is also older tooling, and Moebius doesn't have "one trick pony's" in their automotive lineup, also both don't have such features like metal transfers and pre-cut window masks.
  4. What IMHO makes Tamiya great is that it's a company not run by American MBA's, Their mission, create within limits the best possible plastic model kit, for enthusiast modelers. They embrace new technology and will incorporate it when they design, it also helps that Tamiya is still Tamiya and not a company that changed hands several times, so they can maintain their level of quality and all noses point the same way concerning strategy, but Japanese are also stubborn people and will do what "they" will think is right , anyway that's what Francois Verlinden always said to me, and he dealt with (the late) Mr Tamiya (sr.) . In the US the engineers more often than not have struggle with the "faster cheaper" managers who look at end users as suckers, relying on old technology for short term profit and every time the company changes hands, a new corporate executive will implement his great new vision on what the company product line will have to look like, but by the result of these ideas will show, will be gone on his quest to be at the top of the food chain. Anyway the gist I'm getting from this tread is, we're all very happy that Tamiya is releasing this kit, only some of us hoped there was more icing or extra whip-cream topping on the already absolutely delicious cake, and there's nothing wrong with that. Luc
  5. A comment I can agree with 100%
  6. Tim, I don't know if you're in the minority here, just because a few take the time to voice their opinion, many many more here only read and don't wanna enter the discussion, cuz there's no right or wrong. Also the weak and strong point of the automotive side of the hobby is that there are many different kinds of modelers, be it either the weekend modeler or the group which is often referred to, as the lunatic fringe, and then everything in between, so a company always will have something for everyone, while disappointing everyone else There are modelers who are pretty comfortable with wire axles, one piece chassis and chrome-headlamp design, the other wish a true scale replica, with all the whistles and bells of the subject chosen. Tamiya in this instance made a design decision, based merits only know to them, it could be price setting, consumer feedback or just what they thought the kit should look like, now we can all voice our opinion here, but doubt that any of our concerns, wishes or praise will get to the those making the dissensions there, they will look at the ROI and feedback from their national and international distributors. Is it bad voicing our opinion be it praise or disappointment, no cuz personally I too would've like an engine, but know that aftermarket companies who are much more flexible and more in touch, (and can make a buck on dealing) with the smaller niche, will jump in to fill that void, will it come at an extra cost, yes...but I'm willing to pay that to have something that will give me 100% satisfaction. And yes no need for name calling, but in the heat of the moment, we all sometimes do something we might regret later, and I'm not an exception, we're all here just because of one thing, the passion that unites us all, the love of building/collection and talking about scale automotive model kits. Luc
  7. It's kinda strange how they designed that, and from the look of it it wouldn't taken much, to make it full detail, maybe depending on sales a next version could be, or wait for the aftermaket to step up
  8. Here's the instruction sheet...so one can prepare... https://cdn.simba-dickie-group.de/downloads/300024354/300024354_Ford_Mustang_GT4.pdf
  9. Have one of those too, bad chrome et all....
  10. IIRC It's the elastomere (sp?) option, I like it...but wonder what changes have been made to the tool, the front bumper looks the same, side markers are still '71, I assume the rr wheel wells were enlarged to accommodate the fat tires (had to do the same when I modified mine into a restomod)
  11. An MO which fit's Moebius like a glove. I'm also in favor of all new kits of the '73-86 Chevy C/K's, Blazers and 72-'93 Dodge Ram and Ramcharger in 1/25th but also a few in 1/35th (for the military model community)
  12. I don't know much about hot rods, but what's the trend in the real world with these kind of vehicles? Anyway...did a quick look at what's in the box old vs new and besides the engine swap I see that both chassis and tailpipes have been retooled and so do the frames which contains the interior parts..
  13. My mistake.
  14. With so many tools ( Amt, Mpc, Revell, Monogram, Fujimi) available of that gen Camaro, very unlikely
  15. Good question, as the regular '70 Dodge Charger kit is (per Revell AG) also unavailable on the EU market.
  16. https://www.micromark.com/Plug-N-Plate-Copy-Chrome-Plating-Kit?_ga=2.159246259.802722808.1584301731-296538312.1584301731
  17. I passed on the previous releases of this tool mainly because it's curbside, and for off road vehicles I like all the greasy bits to be present including the engine, the reason also I'm not interested in the one Meng released.
  18. Too bad these all suffer from sinkmarks at the front and rear cap, one would think engineers would've solved this problem by altering the tooling a bit in those areas.
  19. Mine are the '69-'70 Jo-Han Cadillac DeVille and Mpc '72 Roadrunner, depending on the outcome of the FF Revell kit the latter one may or may not fall off that list.
  20. No the current Revell fastback doesn't share anything with this kit, which turned into a funnycar IIRC
  21. easy fix though, just need a pair of scissors. It's kind like with MPC not having the Trans Am licensing back in the day
  22. check out Chris his video....
  23. It's a great build, no doubt about that, but it also shows like sour thumb that the facia is incorrect too much of an angle, the Monogram 1/24th scale kit suffers from the same problem. Time for Revell to tool up a new one based on their coup!
×
×
  • Create New...