my66s55

It's not that easy to explain but, I try my best. First of, it's like a model. It's assembled in pieces. This is the total car: here are some brake out shots:

Let me enlighten you on Hum3d. I use them and the models are very good. At $75 a pop, their worth it to me. The 37 F & F Delehaye 135 I'm working on is from them. If you want a 3d printable file, it's $400. Since I am able to use a cad software, I can make the $75 file printable.

.200 millimeters is 200 microns. 200 microns .01 inch.

A new printer needs to have print specks established before any real printing can be done. In this case, it's the lowest light exposure per layer that will give you the best quality print. So you use a calibration file and start testing with differing numbers. Each layer thickness calibration used will have different numbers. The one on the top was 35 microns layers and the one on the bottom was 20 microns layers. If you look just to the left of the letters 5,6,7, you can can make out the letters that are very small and spell breaking.

I'm going to post pics of test prints as low as 20 microns.Yes, you simply pour the unused resin through a strainer and funnel back into the resin bottle for future use.

The print height is 180 mm. A little over 7". I printed the body and rear fenders of my 37 F & F Delehaye at 100 micron layers in a little under 6hrs. It's 73 mm. I'll post photos later. The resin is $76.00 a liter. It goes a long way and there is very little shrinkage with the one I use.

Over the past couple of years the 3d printing community has been active in perfecting a different type of s.l.a. d.l.p. printer. The conventional style, as was the one I built and used, cured u.v. resin with the light source from a d.l.p. movie projector or laser beam. The new type uses the light produced by an l.e.d. diode that passes through an l.c.d. light panel such as is done on a computer screen. This difference in the light source did two things. The best resolution from a d.l.p, projector is 1920 x 1080. This creates a pixel count of 12 per square millimeter. The l.c.d. panel used in the new printers have a resolution of 2640 x 1440 that produce 27 pixels per square millimeter. Over twice the resolution. Secondly, a d.l.p. projection costs $600.00 plus. An l.e.d diode and l.c.d screen costs less than a quarter of that. End result, lower cost and higher quality printing. One year ago, two Chinese companies introduced a version of he l.e.d. printer. One of them being Wanhoa. Improvements were made through the year and the result is two well made printers. Wanhoa, who is a large, well know producer of desk top 3d printers, is the least expensive. They still weren't plug and play until this last October when Wanhoa introduced the D7 Box. There is a Wanhoa Duplicator Facebook page with 5061 members and tons of help. I purchased mine on November 2 and it was shipped DHL from mainland China. It was received November 7. Full tracking was provided. My cost was $495.00 for the printer and $125.00 for the box. Shipping was free. The box runs the printer and eliminates the need for a computer. It's basically plug and play although, there is still a learning curve. Here's what it looks like. Next, I'll show some print results

It's difficult to tell the bottom color in the picture but, a common stock color combo for 56 is India ivory and sierra gold.

They are a little larger than 1:24. I didn't print them any smaller as I wanted to be able to take a picture to post. I use FunToDo Deep Black resin. It, imho as well as others opinion, gives the greatest detail and least shrinkage of the the available uv resins. The Shapeways is printer is laser cure based like the Form One and uses a different blend. FunToDo offers a blend for the Form One in black and it wouldn't surprise me if Shapeways didn't use it.

It's a little fuzzy, but still clear enough to make them out.

Dirty wash? Not really. What was needed was a printer upgrade from a 2 year old top down dlp unit to the newest led lcd printer.

Yes, your right John. I looked it up real quick and miss read the wekipedia.

Ford used that same basic frame for Ford and Mercury at least through 66. I know this because the 66s55 in my sig is for my fill size 66 Merc. The engine in the 58 Pacer is a mel. They look basically the same as the fe.

I use a tin-cure silicone r.t.v. from Smooth-On called Mold Max. It's made for making molds on various types of resin. Also I don't need to use a mold release agent. The u.v. cured resin I use to create prints on my 3d printers is very brittle and small, thin parts can break off easily. Be vary gentle removing the part from the mold and you should be o.k.

And best of all...free

I totally agree with the no sale. Every reason I can think of for not doing has been stated.

I never noticed before, but my Ubuntu Linex uses Chromium and not Chrome. So I've been unknowingly using Chromium all along. No wonder it works so well.

A couple of weeks ago I loaded an add on called Privacy Badger to Chrome. It stops trackers. It also stopped these pictures from being viewed. I turned it off for this sight and one other and all is well.

Problem solved.

this one says photo-iv# .jpeg for all photos: http://www.modelcarsmag.com/forums/topic/124241-1958-plymouth-318-poly-head-3d-printed-engine-finished-71317/ this one says DSCN6274 inthe first post. All other pictures are good: http://www.modelcarsmag.com/forums/topic/126962-1959-desoto-fireflite-convertible/#comment-1841629

I'm getting DSCXXXX instead of pictures. Why????

I'm also on Linux. Firefox is a turtle and Chrome flies. It's always been that way. I'm running Adblock Plus and Privacy Badger and Chrome still flies.

Enjoy your retirement Marty. I retired at 62. I'll be 73 in January. I have to agree with Rich though. My motivation isn't as great as it once was.

Google is your friend. Seafoan green http://www.oldcarsweekly.com/news/hobby-news/legendary-1954-chevrolet-corvair-dream-car-recreated