johnbuzzed

Yep, I remember that ad. They did not produce that kit. Bummer.

To pick nits, Plymouth used the term "6-BBL" or "6 BARREL". Dodge used "SIX-PACK" or "440-6". Either way, it would be nice to see other variations of this kit. And, AMT/Ertl included a 3X2 intake setup on a 340 in one issue of their '70 Duster kit. It's got an A/C system, but that should be easy to eliminate.

Bada-bum !!!

Yep, I'm aware of the diecast versions of the Power Wagon, having seen the DM wrecker up-close and in-person, but perhaps I exaggerated re: my right one... not that I've looked a lot but from what I've seen, the $$$ for those die-casts are a bit high and I believe it's worth more than that!

Sorry for the confusion- I would buy the Jag in a heartbeat.

The article advises that for the same mega bucks as the E-type, one can buy a Bugatti Veyron, with all the bells and whistles. Why would anyone do that?

Art, I would give my right one for that Powerwagon kit. Well, maybe... but that has always been on my list of what I'd like to have. Then, on an oddball track, a Plymouth pickup would be cool. Obscure, yes, but cool.

Along the same line is: Why don't we have anything else from the pre-war era besides Fords? Sure, there is the '39 Chevy, and the '41 Plymouth... and, some stuff like Cords and Duseys and Lincolns and Imperials. What about all the other manufacturers that were around back then?

Really nice; really, really nice. I would be happy to have that on my shelf.

Brandon, that came out really nice; far better than anything I built when I was your age. You should be proud of your build.

Who's to say that no adults will go for this kit? If this kit is at all accurate (especially body lines and contours), I'll probably buy and build at least one. Not with the graphics, but in the kit colors with the kit components. Paint detailing and BMF can add a lot to a basic, simple build like that. And, even as an somewhat advanced modeler (in both age and experience), there is no reason why I (nor any of us here on this Forum) shouldn't be able to have fun with that kind of build. How many of you "adult" modelers have never bought and built a snap kit?

My next-door neighbor was about 6 years older than me and he had a series of cars ever since I can remember, back to when I was about... 8 years old?... starting in the early '60s. Some of them were really sweet, but the one that stands out in my mind is a '62 Olds Starfire 2door hardtop. It was a metallic red and had all that stainless and brushed trim, with an automatic and 394. I was in love with that car and still am. One evening, we were returning from running an errand for his uncle, heading south down NY 231. Along comes a '68 Coronet R/T. Yeah, we ran- my first street race. That R/T had us off the line, but when the Olds got wound up, it was "Bye, bye". Holy BLAH_BLAH_BLAH_BLAH- "Satisfaction" on the AM radio, windows open, sitting on that big vinyl bucket seat, no seatbelt- what a rush!

Harry, what is that- it looks like a Town and Country?

'71 Satellite- I've seen one done up very nicely. No, wait... my '67 Fury II, with the baby moons and trim rings. No, the '67 Vista Cruiser- do it up a'la 442...

Nice save! That really looks good.

I'd really like to see the same company produce a Genesis coupe, Veloster or even a Sonata. I would most definitely get one (of each).

Why, I find that comment to be offensive.

I wouldn't go near a painted model with an acid brush, especially one that has been cut down. I use them professionally where I work and they can be very aggressive to any finish. It's like washing a car with a bristle brush.

For blue dots, try MV lenses. They are intended for model railroaders, but cross over just fine. Hobby shops that carry a lot of RR stuff should have them or be able to order them, and they are available on line, of course. The lenses come in assorted sizes and colors and there are many model car applications where they can be used.

I don't think it's fair to compare the model manufacturers, which are relatively small companies, to the larger production corporations that are publicly owned and their shares traded daily. Everyone is into business to make money, no two ways about that, no matter what the business is. But some people actually have more of an interest than just making money- in my opinion, some are the model manufacturers, and I'm sure that there are more in so many other companies and corporations around the world. Others are strictly for the money- else, how can one explain the recent GM recall debacle? People died because less money spent on the initial outlay looks great on the spreadsheets and yields bigger dividends to the shareholders. I don't believe that the people in charge at such corporations have any personal interest or investment of any type in what they produce. But, I digress. I believe the model manufacturers enjoy seeing what we do with their products and they do realize that our creativity can be used to their advantage. For example, we now have another issue of the old AMT Parts Packs. Why? Because we have shown interest in them, because we want to incorporate them into our future builds. The best part for them? More revenue- and, happy customers! I might not be a big fan of everything that has been and will be produced in polystyrene, but I will go to bat for my fellow modelers so that we have a better chance of getting those products that we want. The manufacturers are paying attention.

Sorry to read about your mishap- stuff like that really @#&*$, especially when you are so far along on the build. You might want to consider using a thicker, gap-filling cyanoacrylate (super glue/crazy glue) or 5-minute epoxy for that kind of assembly in the future. Put some of whichever you use on a palette of some sort and use a toothpick to apply just the right, small amount where it's needed. You'll have much better control over the thicker glue- no worries about runs- and setting time is much quicker. The secret is to do a lot of dry-fitting, without glue, so that you know just about exactly how the parts is going to fit when it's in place. And, yes, if you take your time and follow the advice offered above, you should be able to fix the problem. I look forward to seeing the finished model.

From what I understand, the flag in question was/is actually the Confederate Battle Flag, and was adopted by General Lee himself. It is a historical item. Yes, many ugly things occured where that flag flew, just as many ugly things did (and still do) occur where the Stars and Stripes flew. But some people might be... offended ( gasp!!! shudder). Along the same lines is the swastika. Yes, it once had a rather benign meaning; unfortunately, it was adopted by a very twisted group of people. Military machines of the Third Reich wore that symbol; you will be hard-pressed to find a military kit of that time and origin with an intact swastika decal. Some might offer it in two pieces, others, not at all. Again, some people might be offended at this piece of history- they might feel it is a type of celebration or glorification of an ugly era.

Blasphemi !!! ">http://http://s889.photobucket.com/user/jbuzz710/media/Powertour%202014%20at%20Z-max/blasphemi.jpg.html'> I believe the crew at "Roadkill" built this Hemi-powered '55. It was at the Power Tour at Z-Max in Concord this year. Very cool

"Wrong" ? "Code"? Our hobby is an art form. There is no wrong, nor is there a code. To quote the late Bob Ross:" You can do anything you want to do. This is your world."

That's a really nice build, Ken. I would be happy to have it on my shelf. Don't worry about the bare metal critiques. Real steel will start to rust as soon as it's exposed to moisture in the air, so unless one lives in the desert, it will not have a nice, shiny look for very long. Oxidation is an ugly thing.