Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

1972coronet

Members
  • Posts

    7,503
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 1972coronet

  1. While I definitely recognise what your point is --and agree with your point--- the category of "vintage" has some relative newcomers ( e.g. , "Gen 3" 426 Hemi , which was last installed in a factory-produced car in July 1971 ---- 44 years ago [!] . Then there's the Mark IV ; FoMoCo's 335 and 385 Series ; etc. ). I'm 45 years old , and the realisation that my favourite cars are as old --if not a bit older-- as me , is only adding to my self-imposed midlife crisis ( ha ha ha ha ) .
  2. Funny thing about the Family Truckster : it was "sold" at Glendale Dodge ! A view of the other cars on the lot reveals a bevy of M-bodies and K-cars . A Victoria wagon --heavily modified-- sold at a Dodge dealership . Too much ! In-so-far-as the proposed Bluesmobile : I love it ! Now , the actual cars were really retired California Highway Patrol units ! The production crew's master body man painted the cars to Mt. Prospect livery . I would like to additionally propose that the Monaco sedan 'option' include a 360 , with two barrel and HP (4 barrel) options (and the correlating single exhaust [2Bbl] and dual exhaust [4Bbl] ). Throw an 8 track player into the A/C vents on the passenger side , complete with Sam and Dave's Greatest Hits ; cigarette butts and empty Chesterfield cigarette packs for the dashboard ; a template to add the rip to the driver's side interior door panel ; and , the busted-out backlight (from the shotgun blast from 'Tucker McElroy' ) , and you've got a deal !
  3. I , too , would LOVE to see a '58-'59 sedan, wagon , and / or Ranchero ! Those years' of the Fords lend them-selves very well to Kustom treatments ; and they look sweet in stock form , too .
  4. Those 1977-1980 Volare kits were certainly better in many respects than their 1971-1976 Duster / Demon / Dart Sport predecessors ! Heck , at least the Volare kits had the 727-A Torqueflite (which matches the automatic shifter and the pedals on the floor !!) , and much better underhood contents ( WOW ! Is that a brake master cylinder that I see ?? Apparently the aforementioned A-bodies weren't 'blessed' with that feature , not even the incorrect 1966 & earlier master cylinder ! ). The air cleaner assembly is reasonablly correct (versus the 1970 & earlier "340" air cleaner in the Duster , et al. , kits) . I will concede that the interior bucket is lacking in door panel details . Other than that , it's a nice kit .
  5. See my edited post . Your photo is better ; at least one can see the "Stock and Custom Building Versions..." text on the box's side ( lower-left in the photo ) .
  6. Last issued in 1979 as a 1980 "annual" . That's probably the only tooling that's left ; I don't believe that it's ever been modified from stock . I have one that I bought ~1 year ago . Although the box doesn't allude to it , parts to build a (close-enough to) stock version are included ( Rallye Wheels ; stock tyres [albeit , still styrene ...] , and stock engine [ which , for 1980 , would be a 318 ... a ripping 120hp 318 ! ] ). It would be nice to see this kit again . Does the tooling still exist in useable condition , Round2 ?
  7. If any-thing , I feel that a breakdown of the "Drag Racing" category is "necessary" ; to wit : "Classic" or "Nostalgia" or "Vintage" versus "New(er)" classes / styles. Why ? I'll admit that I'm prejudiced in regard to race cars ; Pro Mod , et al. , do nothing for me . Now , that's not to speak to the builders' skills or final product(s) ; I just feel that the "new(er)" stuff needs to be segregated from the vintage stuff .
  8. Acetone will melt the plastic right now ! Same with lacquer thinner . Here in the U.S. , it is common to use Castrol Super Clean or its "more-affordable" competitor , Purple Power ; however , I can't speak to what is available in Sweden (or Europe in general).
  9. I haven't heard any-one else refer to that trans as its colloquial name is quite some time ! I agree ; a separate Slim Jim Hydra-Matic would've been a nice option .
  10. Upon a 2nd (okay , 5th) examination of Tim's excellent photos , I witnessed the trim around the backlight ( colloq. , "rear window" ) and the windscreen . It would appear to be an attempt at creating a replication of the "encapsulated" glass trim that was common in that era (think : glass trim on pre-1971 Dodge / Plymouth B-bodies , all years of the A-bodies , etc. ) The weatherstripping "captured" the glass , and then stainless (or , cheapo anodised aluminum in later years) trim was installed around the perimetre , retained by trim retainers which mounted on the rivets in the glass' channels . I don't see why a masking , followed by a scribing of the trim/ glass junction , and the addition of more (layered) tape , wouldn't be an effective way of avoiding the scratching of the glass. Then again , painting the trim with Krylon 'Chrome' (Duplicolor also makes an excellent 'chrome' paint) would probably be easier , and would yield more realistic results .
  11. I believe that the grille is different ... Beyond that , there was a new addition : "440 Four Barrel" emblems if that then-new engine was ordered ( note: the Charger R/T didn't come along until the 1968 model ; R/T was a Coronet-only package in 1967 ). The interior changed ( no more standard fold-down rear seating ; the full-length console was also deleted [ circumcised ? ] ). And , though you didn't ask about functional changes versus the 1966 ; the 1967 models received the requisite "'Dual' (read : tandem) Circuit Braking System" ; no more "Dixie Cup" brake master cylinders !
  12. That's a really cool idea !
  13. It was a tough decision between the 1969 and the 1971 , with my final decision being the 1969 . What decided me was its hubcaps ! Why ? I've been fascinated by those FoMoCo truck and van hubcaps since I was a wee lad ; that design was just so intricate ! So , 40+ years later , I finally got a kit that has them ! I can hardly wait !
  14. I could swear that the kit had those scoops on one of its 'trees' . I built one back in c.1990 , with those scoops , and I could swear that I didn't source them from the parts box nor the Daytona . On a related note : the 1969 Barracuda hood is exactly the same hood as the 1973-1976 Dart / Dart Sport models' hood , in both "1:1" and in-scale .
  15. I really like where this is going ! Here's an ad for the 1968 Biscayne 427 that Joel at Motion was slinging back in the day ( I wonder if any survived ? )
  16. I like that idea a lot ! Toss a Craig 4-track player under the dash , too ...
  17. 4 years later ... any updates on these beauties ??
  18. Although I already have the 1970 Monte Carlo, I could always use another one! Now, if only round2 were to add the engine parts from the 1970 Motion Camaro as a building option ...
  19. Easily the finest execution I've ever seen of that kit ! Your additional craftsmanship really added that much needed touch . Keep 'em coming !
  20. Ahh , yes ... the chopped Pontiac 389 , yielding 194 cubes .
  21. Beautiful engines , from a time when each corporation had its own engines ( I've always liked the Buick "Nailhead" series , and the 225 V6 and its 215 V8 relative ). Am I the only one who's "concerned" by the brake system on that black car ?
  22. Heck, I've been considering using a Pontiac OHC 6 in the AMT 1953 F100...
  23. As a visual artist , the single most humbling experience I've encountered was when I was admiring the works of Robert Williams ! For those among us whom aren't familiar with his name , think of the Guns and Roses "Appetite for Destruction" gatefold art (which I won't share here due to its controversial content ). The artwork itself is beyond astounding , then viewing it in person is another thing all together ; the actual piece is positively huge !! And it's all oil paint (the most painstaking paint to work with ; non-catalysed , slow curing paint ). After leaving the exhibit , I said to my friend and fellow artist , "Well , I give up ! I can't go any where near Williams' work !" A truly humbling --and inspirational-- experience ! My point being that trying to hold a candle to the impressive and impressionable works of others is an exercise in futility . I realise that the scope of my skills isn't as far reaching as I'd like for them to be . Surely , practise makes perfect and all that , but in the end I'm too lazy to dedicate that much effort to one piece. You can't teach any one how to draw , you can only hone their natural skills.
  24. I have an MPC 1974 Vega annual kit , and its only " weak " points are the moulded-in exhaust , and the stock 4 cylinder model's differential. So, if this pending reissue has an unfettered chassis , I'm going to buy it.
  25. Thank you one and all . That was typo on my part regarding the 1968 COPO number. From all that I've read , that specific order is quite esoteric ( reminds me of the 1967 Dart GT+S ; built only the last couple months of the '67 model year , and people deny the cars' existence .) I , like countless others, am amazed that Piggens, et al., wouldn't endorse 427 Nova . After all, the X bodies and the F bodies were kissing cousins ! Thanks again, every one , for your help , advice , and expertise. Let's keep this topic going for a while ; it's nice to learn about these kinds of specialty vehicles.
×
×
  • Create New...