1972coronet

Subjective is an objective way to permit insolence

Best describes the double-edged sword of 'spellcheck'; the difference between 'loser' and 'looser'.

I have made more than a few (or, more than I care to admit to) impulse buys based upon the 'geezer-reflex'; to cite a few: - MPC 1976 Dart Sport. I had an original back in the day; and I already have a copy of the 'retro' "1975" Dart Sport annual re-pop, but that gold coloured 1976 box art popped a memory capsule, and... - AMT 1934 Ford Pickup. Another one I had in me early days of glue kits. It was old -ancient- stock at a sporting goods store, and I was awestruck with its box art. I was 8, and never forgot it. So... - AMT Vantom E-150 [1976?]. Built a number of them in the seventies and very early eighties. Nostalgia ain't what it used to be.

Not to mention the distributor's location. The kit's engine seems to be a hybrid of 'A' engine and 'B'/'RB' engine components. The 1:1's engine is a 350 cube 'B' engine (Chrysler's first-in-a-series of big blocks); the transmission, a cast iron A-488 Torqueflite (which didn't go to aluminium casting until the 1962 model year: the A-727). *EDIT* The kit's intake manifold is also A-engine (in this instance, 318 cube Polyshpere type). The B/RB have a lifter valley pan with a separate intake, all years (1958-1978). I'm thinking that maybe the intake from the 1971 Charger R/T 440 four barrel would fit, but it's a single carburetor.

"DICK JONES! I WORK FOR DICK JONES!", pleaded Clarence Boddicker whilst receiving a thrashing from RoboCop.

While I'm unable to provide any photos, I can say with 93.72% certainty that the other Monogram [et al.] Chevrolet-GMC K-20 [?] pickups share the majority of their parts with the Blazer/Jimmy, excepting, obviously, the body (those tiny door handles!) and at least half of the interior.

I suppose that a disclaimer on the box -- in an obvious location, without being a distraction... maybe on the bottom? On one side? -- would be the best compromise. Yes, the majority of Round2's customers are nostalgic folks (like me, for instance), and are for the most part aware that the contents are anywhere from 35-60 years old. However, buyers do exist who aren't hip to the true age of the kits' contents. I was one of them, some time ago. For their benefit, a disclaimer -- again, tasteful and tactfully-placed -- would at least give neophytes a clue, and hopefully not turn them away from a (fun, relatively-inexpensive) hobby.

What a beauty! Nice and clean; perfect choice of colours. Seldom are these AMT Mercs built stock; yours is a fine, fine example. *another kit that I must add to my collection.

Late, is consistently when my friend arrives: "See you in a French Five Minutes..."

Thanks much for the better info; for clarifying the alpha-numeric assignments. I recall that commercial - light duty pickups including El Camino et al. and Ranchero, and non-passenger vans, are considered as such here in California - plates changed to blue/gold for 1972 (calendar year, IIRC), some two years after passenger vehicles plates changed. Are you the fellow member who's shared historical info (links to documents) here before?

I quote this excerpt for merely one reason: the example truck's licence plate -- that's a 1971 issue (the 'B' as the letter indicates such). My 1970 Ranchero had a plate similar to this one's: 64 870 F. The plates included with the Ramp Truck are pretty close to accurate, needing only accurate spacing between the sets-of-number-to-the-only-letter (also a 'B' at the far-right).

Resource and "up-cycle" are the saveur de l'année amongst the manbun society, though they don't own the rights to that philosphy.

Guilty as in absentia charged. Certainly I wasn't referring to the entirety of Round 2's offerings, though I should have mentioned their great work on updating/improving some of their kits (Grumpy's Toy 1972 Vega; Bruce Larson's 1974 Vega; 1970 Camaro 'full bumper'; International Transtar, to name a few). I apologise for my lack of accolades and acknowledgements of these works. And, yes, some of the intricate details of the newer kits can be overwhelming for someone like me. I positively love that the detail levels have improved; however, speaking as someone with arthritis and ageing vision, the smaller parts become frustrating. Certainly I'm not alone in this. Moebuis's F-Series -- of which I only have the Model King 1969 F-100 -- show so much promise, but the warping issues are, IM shared O, unacceptable. But, again, mentioning Moebius in a Round2 thread -- my mentioning of Moebius -- is non seq. **AMENDMENT** My quip about unmaintained tooling stems from the age of the tooling, which is the natural course of things. And, again, rectifying some of the 'core shift' results is not fun in some instances; again citing the (otherwise great) AMT 1953 F-100 (whose origins date to, what, 1962?). I've built countless copies of that kit since I first discovered it in 1977, but its age is really showing.I just wish that Round2 would restore the tooling -- it's well worth it! Iconic kit for sure.

I, too, would rather see more content (e.g., more and upgraded -- pad printed -- tyres, and vaster-yet-more-comprehensive decals; such as instrument gauges, emblems, etc.) than fluff. The retro gig is a visual delight to me (but, I'm an artist, so...); however, by the same token, I become frustrated by the poor condition of the contents (i.e., kits that have been in virtually constant production for longer'an I've been alive -- 1953 F-100, for an instance) due to wear and/or lack of maintenance - think "core shift", which de facto causes bodies, interior tubs, chassis, engine halves, etc., which are uneven. Some of that is easily fixed, other parts not so much. Truly, I feel that many of the frustrations which many feel stem from the stratospheric price hikes: $30+ for an old 1/25 kit is a lot of coins! Especially when one considers that little to no effort is given to improve the product. Then there's the whole where-it's-made fiasco: How does Salvino's make their kits here and sell them retail for the same price? But, that's a horse of a different colour -- a non-sequitur on my part. I agree regarding the instruction sheets: most are mediocre at best, and downright confounding at worst. Yes, some of us do at least reference the instruction sheets (haha). I'll take the Retro Box Art over those horrid Racing Chumps executions any day.

Considering the source: On July 26, 2022, it was reported that [Tony] Dow was in his "last hours" under hospice care in Topanga, California. (26.07.2022, 1350 hrs.)

First year for side markers, too (1968). Apparently, whomever built the prototype of the 1967 Ramp Truck wasn't aware of this. Well, at least that prototype didn't have a warped bonnet. Wink.

What about the one you lifted from the International Towers in Long Beach?

Molly Anne, Oliver Sabastian, and dumpy ole me, 26.07.2014. After another rough day at work, it's nice to cuddle with superior creatures, especially when their motors are running.

Glue is the adhesive which Crosby refers to, in absentia, in the line "A bunch of Reds are missing/from this tapestry..."

And the world has never been the same...

I know what you mean -- those 'Eskimo Kisses' and head butts are delightful. There's just something about those black & white 'farm cats'; Whiskers is a lovely example. My love bug, Tæo, is a black & white farm cat. I've had him for two years; he was a 'little potatoe' when I got him. Do you have other animal companions?

Sorry to hear of this. What's your companion's name?

One of the most iconic cars in history - world history - is at last being given its propers. I'd lost track of how many of the 1966 coupes I'd built over the last 40+ years; how many of the Monogram 1965-1966 fastbacks I'd built since the first release in 1984, 1985 (hard for me to accept that those Monogram [et al.] kits are almost 40 years old!). Certainly, I'm not alone in hoping for period-correct speed parts for this kit. So many possibilities! Drag, custom, road race, and other factory stock versions.

Same with the Jill Challengers: both were 1970 models -- one a 440 Magnum R/T; the other a 383 two barrel -- but had 1973 front and rear facies (and licence plates).

This album (see image) doesn't necessarily qualify as obscure album when one considers it was a million sales release. However, this particular mix -- MONO -- is largely ignored in favour of the (inferior) stereo mix. This track, Daily/Nightly, is one of the earliest uses of the then-new Moog synthesiser; Star Collector is the other Moog-laced track. In my shared opinion, the mono mix beats the stereo edit, and this is one of the finest examples -- that Moog just comes to life in mono! Enjoy!