Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

GM Design Studio Drawings, Clay Models, & Prototypes


Recommended Posts

On 9/20/2018 at 2:17 PM, Howard Cohen said:

There have been several articles about styling over the years and a few books written by stylists.

The ultimate Must Have when it comes to automotive styling and design:

Style-cover300.jpg

 

These two Michael Lamm books are must haves, too, if youre interested in GM F-bodies:

511M48WSX6L._SY473_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

s-l1600.jpg

 

9 hours ago, henry57 said:

Wow! great pics, any tri-fives?

Cars That Never Were is also a great book, featuring many different makes of cars which never made it past the design or clay stage, including some great Tri-Five Chevies:

51k4CLs8RmL.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of the mockups were so odd looking, it's almost hard to believe they got as far as full-scale clays. Of course, it's relatively easy to heavily modify a clay, but still, it's a LOT of effort for something that really had no hope of production, and little carryover into anything eventually built.

This thing, for instance. GM never used anything other than part of the roofline (excluding the tapered C-pillar)... 

15181189_998210186991200_648802638052209

...and the front fender blisters, which eventually found a home on the C2 Corvette (which appears to have inherited the peaked hood / nose as well) ...

Image result for C2 Corvette

...and remarkably, over at Chrysler, on the '61 Dodge Dart...

Related image

Edited by Ace-Garageguy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That "''72" El Camino photo is much closer to actual production than most of the other design studies shown here.  

How do I know that?  First, the GM "A-Body" program was originally scheduled for the 1972 model year, not 1973 as actually occurred.  Various explanations for the delay include a UAW strike early in the program development, and another more recent explanation that escapes my memory bank at the moment.     

Second, well into the 1972 A-Body program, the federal bureaucracy inserted itself into the automotive design world with their declaration that all 1973 cars would have to have 5mph front bumpers.  The 1972 (now 1973) GM A-bodies had to be redesigned, relatively late in the development process, to accommodate the 5mph front bumpers.  Some of the cars (the Buick Century Regal and particularly the Olds Cutlass and Cutlass Supreme) managed the transition to the bigger bumpers well.  The other two, the Chevelle/Malibu/ElCamino, and the Pontiac LeMans/GTO (other than the Grand Am) suffered greatly.  This mage gives us a hint of what the Chevelle/Malibu front end might have looked like without the 5pmh bumper change.  Not the most beautiful design, but infinitely more commercially acceptable than the final 1973 production design that resulted.  

Thanks guys for posting all these GM Design Studio photos.....TIM 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ace-Garageguy said:

Some of the mockups were so odd looking, it's almost hard to believe they got as far as full-scale clays. Of course, it's relatively easy to heavily modify a clay, but still, it's a LOT of effort for something that really had no hope of production, and little carryover into anything eventually built.

This thing, for instance. GM never used anything other than part of the roofline (excluding the tapered C-pillar)... 

15181189_998210186991200_648802638052209

...and the front fender blisters, which eventually found a home on the C2 Corvette (which appears to have inherited the peaked hood / nose as well) ...

Image result for C2 Corvette

...and remarkably, over at Chrysler, on the '61 Dodge Dart...

Related image

Hard to tell from the angle of this picture, but the rear window opening reminds me of the '61 Chevrolet 2 and four door sedans. They had a slight wraparound with the roof extending flat over the top edge of the rear window. The windshield looks very much like the '61 Chevrolet, Pontiac, Oldsmobile and Buick models. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/19/2018 at 4:43 PM, om617 said:

caddy1.jpg

This look fantastic. Do you know what year this claymodel was made?

I love how close the prototype for the 1967 Cadillac is the final product.

More info here: http://www.eldorado-seville.com/67eldo/67eldohistory/

 

xp-784-d-50497.jpg

 

Good thing this bug-eyed monstrosity never made it through, but those suicide rear doors were a thing for a while:

xp-727-d-39369.jpg

 

I love how the A-pillar flows right out into the hood peak edges on the below car. The quad headlights mounted low, not so much:

xp-825-d-53975.jpg

 

Edited by Casey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love this thread. Fantastic photos. I've always been fascinated by concept and development sketches and mockups. 

I'd also highly recommend the book "A Century of Automotive Style". It's full of cool stuff. I picked one up years ago, and it was hard to track down...took ages to get here...but when it did, it was signed by one of the authors, Michael Lamm...so that was neat!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, espo said:

Hard to tell from the angle of this picture, but the rear window opening reminds me of the '61 Chevrolet 2 and four door sedans. They had a slight wraparound with the roof extending flat over the top edge of the rear window. The windshield looks very much like the '61 Chevrolet, Pontiac, Oldsmobile and Buick models. 

Yeah, that would be the "part of the roofline" I referred to as one few things GM did use from that particular exercise...though I now see I should have been very specific. I thought it was so obvious I didn't need to really go into it, but it would have made more sense if I'd said "greenhouse" rather than "roofline" anyway.  :D

Edited by Ace-Garageguy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Ace-Garageguy said:

Some of the mockups were so odd looking, it's almost hard to believe they got as far as full-scale clays. Of course, it's relatively easy to heavily modify a clay, but still, it's a LOT of effort for something that really had no hope of production, and little carryover into anything eventually built.

This thing, for instance. GM never used anything other than part of the roofline (excluding the tapered C-pillar)... 

15181189_998210186991200_648802638052209

...and the front fender blisters, which eventually found a home on the C2 Corvette (which appears to have inherited the peaked hood / nose as well) ...

 

 

There is a lot of similarity in the overall shape of the rear fender with the '61 Olds.

Heavily smoothed down & minus the dual creases.

The roof line is very evident in this example as well.

image.png.6b183c529701fa3c8da70aa117a437ed.png

 

A modified version of the hood peak showed up on the '61 Buick long before the '63 Vette, but I can see how they threw at least 3 similar features of the front end of this model into the front of the Corvette.

image.png.4195370c5a6f51d0c356ccd6f7fccd00.png

 

 

Steve

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

One thing I have noticed is that they found what they like with these mockups and what they did not like. Sometimes if you really look at something you can see features that are similar but changed as others have pointed out with the fender shapes front and rear. 

I also noticed the one picture (with the GM logo ) that had what looked to me like a Ford truck on the other side of Chevy truck. Yes I know they all have each others cars in their R&D buildings at one point or another. Dad always talked about the alternators they had at their Ford plant they were testing from the other companies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool pics 

I watched a special about GM where they take mockups outside and park them at different angles and the head design  guy sits inside a building looking over the cars looking at how the light plays off the body lines.  He said many have been altered after that because they determined the bodies weren't quite perfect yet. Very interesting show

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Joe Handley said:

One thing I find interesting is that somebody there saw fit to sort of bring back the "Bubble Top" shape on the '88-'03 Cavelier and Sunbird/Sunfire Coupes, just with more curve and less clunky appearing than the original Bubble Top.

1995_chevrolet_cavalier_coupe_z24_fq_oem

833801c740192c_hd_1961-chevrolet-impala.

Can't forget about the 2005-09 Cobalt! More than likely they had the early '60's on their minds. ;)

2008-chevrolet-cobalt-sport-coupe-side-view.png.886efbf3e18425b2f966cde4ebdc6ee8.png

Too bad it was never pillarless like that '61!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Around '88 or '89 we got a new Cavalier Z-24 for my wife. The rear window looked like a miniature '61 Impala. The GM cars with the "bubble roof" from 1961 thru 1962 on the Chevrolet Bel Air Hardtops have always been a design I liked.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgot about the Cobalt!  Friend of mine has one in that is a Supercharged SS in black that he did some sort of Caddy V Series front brake upgrade on, looks pointlessly huge on a Cobalt unless you realize it's an SS with a factory power adder and that they could actually use that extra brake!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, espo said:

Around '88 or '89 we got a new Cavalier Z-24 for my wife. The rear window looked like a miniature '61 Impala. The GM cars with the "bubble roof" from 1961 thru 1962 on the Chevrolet Bel Air Hardtops have always been a design I liked.  

I had noticed it with the first gen Saturn SC coupe too, but as late as it was forgot about the '88-'94 Cavalier and the SC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now THIS is definitely a great modeling subject for me!

5bf2c75753e79_1965Camarotwoseatprototype.JPG.fd5643b70df7de05f1eb96012c54bdf8.JPG

It was said that this prototype was under serious consideration for production, but in the end Chevy deemed it too costly and might have bit into sales of the Corvette. Hmmm..........a shortened '67 Camaro body and chassis, straighten out the upper fender line, Big Block 396 power.........SS trim......Very Interesting! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I need to start saving money for those Moebius Chevy II kits too. I have a few of those Trumpeter kits and they're not bad either... But one or two of each Moebius versions isn't probably enough. The Chevy II is a great looking body style, and that's not only because I have one in 1:1 scale.:P

Edited by W-409
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...