As for me, I think it's a case of getting used to things being a certain way when I was a youngster. Now that better things are available, they just don't look right. The best example is AMT's "sectioned" 32 Ford. The accurate Revell kit just looks wonky to me. The Sizzler vs. Slingster suffers from this. I've read that the frame rails are the right size in 1/25, as is the tiny body, but it just looks wrong. Even accounting for the scale difference, when I opened the box one of the first thoughts that came to mind was maybe if I sprayed about 40 coats of primer on the frame to fatten it up it would ok. The Double Dragster did nothing to help that opinion. Being one of the first kits I ever bought, I got used to the thick old frame. So much that the Revell parts pack dragster frames ( along with the Slingster ) look terrible to me. I haven't measured either. I was going to say we should use the Slingster as a reference point until I remembered the slicks and non-dished mags they gave us. Might work on a 60's Jr. Stocker, not on a rail.