Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Force

Members
  • Posts

    4,599
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Force

  1. A friend of mine in our club garage owns a white 1957 Chrysler 300C and I see the car every time I'm there, he has just rebuilt the 392 Hemi and are prepairing the car for a new paintjob...it wasn't bad before but he wanted it to be perfect. Just to clarify, the lens under the tail light is not for the turn signal, it's the backup lights and yes you are quite right, they should be transparent clear. The rear turn signals on most classic American cars are the same as the brake lights wich flicks on and off when it's on and it's in the same bulb as the regular tail light wich has two filaments, one for the tail light and one for the brake/turn signal...so it's behind the red lens. The front turn signals are often the same as the parking lights and is clear or in some cases amber, in my country they have to be clear as we aren't allowed to have a steady amber light at the front of our cars, amber or orange turn signals yes but not any other lights. Nice work on the engine, it looks beautiful.
  2. The race trailers were only three issued, the Galles Kraco Indycar Transporter, the Bill Elliott Coors Melling Racing NASCAR Transporter and the Kodak Film Morgan McClure Racing Ernie Irvan NASCAR Transporter, all were the same except for decals.
  3. Yes, but I would change to a spring suspension maybe from the White Freightliner as the 350 did not have air ride as an option. The Western Unit Stabilaire suspension wich is in the 359 California Hauler came 1964 in the 351, 352 and 359 and was available up to 1970 when Peterbilt made their own Air Leaf. But everything can be changed and upgraded so you can of course use whatever you like.
  4. None that I know of, maybe you can cut down a NASCAR V8 and use that.
  5. NASCAR has had a maximum engine displacement of 358 cui for many years now and you might never really know the true horsepower and torque numbers as most teams who built the engines were very secret about that, but somewhere around 550 to 750 hp depending on track and maybe around 530-550 lbs torque...or even higher. Back then the No 88 was a Robert Yates team car driven by Dale Jarrett and the engine was most lileky based on a 351 windsor bored up to 358 cui and built by the Yates team wich is defunct since some years, Robert Yates succumbed to cancer some years ago but his son Doug build the Ford FR9 engines the Ford NASCAR teams use today together with Roush (Roush/Yates engines) and that's a totally different engine from what they used back then and they make 800 plus hp but are restriced down depending on track and aero package.
  6. I am very familiar with both engine types as I have worked on them a lot, I help a friend with his Super Comp Dragster with a 460 in it as a mechanic and I'm currently putting together a 390 based 445 stroker for my 1963½ Ford Galaxie 500XL Fastback. These engines are as different as apples and pears.
  7. Well I'm a fan of the man, not the car. I'm with you in that statement.
  8. That's a bit strange, the 360/390 and the 429/460 are from different engine familys, FE and 385 and they don't share much except for the 15426378 firing order.
  9. Me neither and the photo link doesn't work.
  10. Well it's sad because it's nothing wrong to have a correct database on kit historys and kit relations, especially now when there has been merges, buyouts and mixed up brands, it's not easy to know what you are going to get if you haven't been in the hobby for 40-50 years. But we might have to go back to topic now.
  11. Yes you might call it progress and evolution but not all progress is of good. NHRA started to loosen up the rules when the Camaro and Firebird fourth generation bodies came 1993 wich generated more downforce due to the wide body and narrow top they had, so they let the racers narrow the top on other bodies too like on the Mustang and other bodies where the roofline did go all the way out to the body sides to even out the competition, and we ended up with nitro powered wedges they use today. Even the Alcohol floppers looks more like the cars they are supposed to be than the Nitro cars do.
  12. Very nice build. I agree with Francis, the old Funny Cars from that era up to the early 90's looks a lot better than the ugly wedge door stop shaped body with a small blob on top we have today wich looks noting like the cars they are supposed to be.
  13. Yes they are not easy kits but they build up well if you have patience enough to take your time with them.
  14. You are right about that. Even if it has lots of good information the website is confusing as some information is missing some are totally wrong. I only have the BC version of the Woody/Pickup and the 1978 version, so I know that information is correct, the other ones I don't have.
  15. Well I did my comments based on the information at the Scalemates website. They have the AMT 1928 kit dated 1964 and show no relation to the MPC kits, the MPC 1929 Woody 1962, the 1928 Pickup 1965, The Wild Ones 1929 Woody/Pickup 1966 and the 1928 Street Rod pickup 1978, the 1929 4'n1 kit 1987 and the BC 1929 Woody/Pickup 4'n1 version 2001. So Scalemates is a decent source of information but not that accurate all the time since the timelines and kit relations often are off.
  16. Quite right, I have that one. The 1929 Woodie came 1962 and they did a 1928 Pickup based on the same tooling 1965, the 1928 Pickup with the Chevy small block and Corvette rear end came 1978...I built one back then and I do have another unbuilt one in the stash. The more stock 1928 Roadster Pickup shares most of the tooling with the 1929 Woodie and has been out as 4'n1 kits labeled as 1929 a couple of times, The Wild Ones version from 1966, Woodie/Pickup from 1987 and the latest reissue was the Buyers Choice Woodie/Pickup version from 2001. The street rod version of the 1928 pickup from 1978 looks to share some of the tooling with the other kits but a lot of the parts are different like half of the chrome sprue, engine/transmission, rear end and some other parts and this kit has never been reissued in that state.
  17. Yup, 4 injected Buick Nailheads and 4 blown Pontiac 389's.
  18. The "Poly" name stayed well into the 90's (at least with some manufacturers) and the difference with the old metallics and new metallics is the old ones was one stage paint where you not had to use clear as the paint itself dried with a gloss finish, the newer Metallics are two stage where the metallic paint itself dries dead matte and you have to lay clear coats over it to get the correct shade of the paint and get it gloss, like the paints available to us today.
  19. Nice progress and I'm eager to see more. Here is the largest excavator we have at my worksite right now, a 352F wednesday this week with the just then total renovated undercarriage trying to get down through the ground frost so I can lay 10 inch storm water pipes and drains beside the bypass road we are building, the newly built overpass in the background is going to lead to the Volvo Cab plant where they do most of the cabs for the Volvo trucks wich is located in my town. Boy the ground was hard and this job with the 352 took over two days because the ground was frozen solid about 5 feet deep and he had to break through it for about 50 yards so I could do my job.
  20. You're welcome. One can use many things for detailing models that's meant for a completely different use, look after what's usable and what would look good and work , I do that a lot when I'm at stores, and your imagination and ingenuity is the limit. If you browse around here you will get many ideas for usable products.
  21. It's a catch tank also called "puke tank" for oil, oil vapour and humidity from blowby in the engine when it runs and should be empty before a run, a catch tank for oil and oil vapour is mandatory on all nitro and alcohol cars and also in many other classes to prevent spillage on the track. After a lot of oildowns from engine failures NHRA mandated a larger more efficient catch tank with a capacity of at least 2 gallons in 2010, a diaper or belly pan under the engine wich could contain all the 16 quarts of oil in the engine of the nitro cars was also mandated, this to try to get less track cleaning time after an engine blows up going down the track. It's not perfect but has cut track cleaning time a lot since then. I have not seen anyone who does these hoses/tubes on the after market so If you can't find one you have to make your own. Try at the wanted section here on the forum and someone might have one for you, the Revell modern era Top Fuel kits were made from 1991 to 2002 so they are not hard to find, and the part you need is unaltered in these kits. Otherwise they are quite easy to make.
  22. I have done a few over the years, they are not unbuildable, you just have to have patience and go slow and test fit a lot. So they are nothing you put together quickly with super glue as you might have to adjust along the way to square them up and get them right.
×
×
  • Create New...