List of Moebius Upcoming Kits

[Rob Hall]

17 hours ago, tim boyd said:

Chris....II expect that this may be a second /FX version that was engineered when the original A/FX version was designed.  I'll leave it to Dave to confirm, deny, or provide further details, but the original engineering work was, as near as I could determine, really well done and fully worthy of an actual kit release.   

Of course, I also realize that is exactly not what you are looking for here...

Best...TB 

There was talk a couple years ago about a B/FX version.  

This whole list is questionable, given the typos and that most of the kits listed have already been released or announced. 

[Daddyfink]

1 hour ago, RT6PK said:

Dumping the originals could be a gamble. Many years ago when AMT still existed, there was an ad hanging in a local hobby shop announcing "soon to released" kits from AMT. One of the kits was the '69 Dodge Coronet R/T. It was probably going to have the new (for that time) chassis that was used on the '68 Roar Runner and '70 Super Bee. I had 2 original MPC '69 Coronet R/T's that had been built but were both unpainted with nice chrome and the original boxes. They would have been very easy restorations. I sold them on Ebay for I think about $75.00 each. AMT went belly up, the Coronets never came out, and I was out 2 very nice originals. 

The other side of that is the Revell '30 Model A Coupe. The tooling was damaged and it was unknown if the kit would ever be seen again. Originals were showing up on Ebay for over $100.00 each. Then there was talk that the tooling was going to be repaired. I gambled and sold my 2 unbuilts on Ebay and did quite well. 

I was really joking about dumping them on ebay since that seems to be the case when we get re-issues or new kits of something considered dead and gone. 

But I don't blame those who do it, I blame those who buy them with no research and then cry about it. Trust me, it has happened to me. 

As for replacing the Jo Han tooling, yes, I think this will end up being way better as far as detail is concerned. We all can't get that stuff anymore, but it will be nice to have fresh plastic, with more detail, available to us once again. 

[1972coronet]

I suppose that my comment about the proportions of the Johan kit was taken out-of-context; I was referring only to the body, not the rest of the kit/tooling.

[250 Testa Rossa]

4 hours ago, Rob Hall said:

There was talk a couple years ago about a B/FX version.  

This whole list is questionable, given the typos and that most of the kits listed have already been released or announced. 

I seriously hope we get a B/FX version. That would be really cool. 

[satterwhite78]

If so and if true........The scene in when Harry met Sally at the Coffee shop........well, you can take it from there!  Lol!  Let's get those Maverick molds in the injection machines!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Daddyfink]

My friend just sent me this

[Rob Hall]

Yeah, that's fake box art that's been going around the internet for a couple of years...don't think it's anything official.

[Can-Con]

OK, so, 

Some of you who also watch the Spotlight board may have seen that one of the members there has "sent a note to Mobius customer service" and got a response.  

It's just an internet hoax. 

So, there you have it. NOT REAL. NO Mavericks of any sort being made by them. 

 

Seeing as it came from Fakebook , I'm not surprised.

If someone on Facebook told me my name is Steve, I'd check my underware before believing it. and even then I'd wonder if it was someone elses underware I had on. ??

Edited February 26, 2023 by Can-Con

[Daddyfink]

Apparently my friend got the list from a Mike Powell, who sells resin and kits. Apparently a friend of Dave Burkett and some of the folks at Moebius 

I am just passing it along. Bummer if it is a hoax. 

[Khils]

1 hour ago, Can-Con said:

Seeing as it came from Fakebook , I'm not surprised

I have enough drama in my life!

Exactly "why" I don't do Faceplant...and still it haunts me in my hobby!

[stavanzer]

3 minutes ago, Khils said:

Exactly "why" I don't do Faceplant...and still it haunts me in my hobby!

I agree. Many modelers on the 'book, know next to nothing about the history of the hobby, and spread harmful rumors with amazing speed.

[bobthehobbyguy]

Somehow I am not surprised this was a hoax.

Unfortunately social media is a common breeding ground for rumors and incorrect information which some are too willing to believe. Have better things to do with my time.

[iBorg]

The Jo-Han Maverick/Comet motor is really good. If Moebius offered that quality, I'd be happy to see it return. Same for many of the interior parts. When I first saw this rumor I contacted one individual with good industry connections. His comment was, "The only thing I KNOW is it has been on the 'TO DO' list for a while........but so has a 70 Javelin.....so.........."

I also contacted Moebius directly.

It's a good suggestion, but there's been "Moebius" box art for a Maverick for years that is an internet hoax, so don't get fooled into thinking it's right around the corner. Moebius Models On 2023-02-18 03:37, iborg wrote: I saw a rumor that Moebius was developing a Dyno Don Maverick…….before I put massive hours into correcting a Johan kit, can you tell me if there is any possible truth to this? Thanks, Mike

[1972coronet]

I was fooled (haha). But, at least I have my aforementioned Johan '70 'Rick 2-in-1 to fulfill that desire.

Heck, if Moebius - or any manufacturer - creates a Maverick/Comet, I'll be sure to place my original on eBay for, I dunno, 800.00$ .

[Rodent]

5 hours ago, Can-Con said:

I'd wonder if it was someone elses underware I had on

Git outta my drawers!

[Sledsel]

No Maverick???? That sucks

[Daddyfink]

My apologies, I should have double checked it before I posted it. 

Sorry

[1930fordpickup]

6 hours ago, Daddyfink said:

My apologies, I should have double checked it before I posted it. 

Sorry

No one is perfect. All is good. 

We all know that a few of the off the regular path cars would sell well in scale. We will be happy if we get a new Maverick (Grabber or not ), better be a small bumper car. LOL

[GMP440]

11 hours ago, Daddyfink said:

My apologies, I should have double checked it before I posted it. 

Sorry

  It's all good.  You didn't do anything wrong.  The pic that was posted; looks like a group of files listing the model car subjects.   Where is that from?  Anyway, if anything, this thread should show Moebius the interest level of an all new kit of the 70 Ford Maverick.  This could very well get the ball rolling at Moebius.

[garagepunk66]

On 2/24/2023 at 9:21 AM, 1972coronet said:

I suppose that my comment about the proportions of the Johan kit was taken out-of-context; I was referring only to the body, not the rest of the kit/tooling.

The only woeful thing about the Jo-Han Maverick kit, aside from the wear and tear the tooling ultimately took, is the promo style chassis. Everything else is first rate. The Boss 429 engine is better than anything AMT or MPC ever offered, and the kit is a plethora of early pro-stock parts, including nice representations of Fenton mags. The interior presents very well too.

[Racephoto1]

Funny, if you read the Moebius note, they never say they"re not doing one, just that it isn't right around the corner. Makes you wonder.

[1972coronet]

4 hours ago, garagepunk66 said:

The only woeful thing about the Jo-Han Maverick kit, aside from the wear and tear the tooling ultimately took, is the promo style chassis. Everything else is first rate. The Boss 429 engine is better than anything AMT or MPC ever offered, and the kit is a plethora of early pro-stock parts, including nice representations of Fenton mags. The interior presents very well too.

I absolutely agree wit you (and others) regarding the BOSS 429; a work of art unto itself. The vintage P/S parts are fantastique, too. 

The 1969 vintage, 1970 annual Maverick I have has the stock interior, moulded-in front bench seat and all. IIRC, this was the only issue of the Johan Maverick to have that 'feature'.  

[Chuck Kourouklis]

4 hours ago, Racephoto1 said:

Funny, if you read the Moebius note, they never say they"re not doing one, just that it isn't right around the corner. Makes you wonder.

Occurred to me too...

[Rob Hall]

3 minutes ago, Chuck Kourouklis said:

Occurred to me too...

By phrasing it as they did, they have plausible deniability.  Or deniable plausibility...whichever applies.

[Joe Nunes]

4 hours ago, Rob Hall said:

By phrasing it as they did, they have plausible deniability.  Or deniable plausibility...whichever applies.

Good marketing tactic!  ?

Joe