Xingu

WWII warbirds are far and away my favorites. I briefly entertained the idea of learning to fly, just so I could (hopefully) fly one. Then I found out how expensive they are to purchase, and to maintain. Decided it would be cheaper to visit a few airshows and build R/C versions. I have a few models that I have squirreled away that I will eventually get to.

Great idea, well executed. Thanks for sharing.

Looking good! I have some figures for my train layout (if I ever get it finished) that I will eventually try to paint.

Looks like $30-35 on Amazon.

On the older BDS type blowers, like these, the belt is usually run as you have them. On the newer systems, with serpentine belts, it would more than likely be on the inside of the tensioner. Looking forward to seeing this model progress.

I see primer anytime a polishing cloth gets to close to something I painted. I use the "Wing and a Prayer" painting method.

Looks like it is going to be a fine workbench. Nice to be able to add a few things you may have wished you had with the old one.

On this board, it leads to an argument. In most cases it comes across as antagonistic, whether intended or not. Doesn't matter what we are talking about. Why not just say you do not like it and explain why or provide an alternative choice and explain how it is better. In this case, if you go back and read from the beginning, the thread started downhill as soon as the putty was called junk. Up to that point it was pretty much unanimous that this stuff is good for small fills and to be avoided for larger work. There was no absolute praise for the product, just a use with caution attitude.

Bob, I have no idea why you jumped in and turned this into personal attacks because someone disagrees with your point of view on this. That is totally uncalled for. None of us need to call a product junk or garbage. If you have a different product that you like just say what it is and explain why you feel it is better. The OP asked for opinions on this and he got some well thought out responses with examples. As with any product we use, there will be those that love it, those that hate and those that don't care. The general consensus is that it is OK for small repairs because it will shrink.

In the case of the Porsche engine, I can see why about 90% of the parts were needed. They definitely are needed to aid installation. The other 10% could have been molded onto other parts. So in this case, Porsche is to blame for most of it. Hard to get the engine and drivetrain into that tiny space otherwise.

Looks good Pat. The ones with a lot of chrome trim are the most satisfying when you are done with the BMF.

This is pretty much the same problem I have, with a different browser and computer setup. I have learned patience. I just wait for things to load.

Thanks for sharing Tim.

I have a hard time getting into testing sessions. Seems like the same stuff every year. Some teams hold back, some teams hit the tire barriers, some teams have major mechanical woes right out the gate. I will start paying closer attention in a few weeks, when everything gets loaded up for the flight to Australia.

My Monogram has a broken windshield, that is why I started this one. Hopefully the hard, long drawn out part is now done.

By the second race either Mercedes will have the extension or the rest of the field will cut theirs off. Depends on the results from Australia.

Here is the cause of my temporary insanity. All 2"x2"x2" of it. I still have a little bit of detail painting to do (not that you are going to be able to see it).

That is what I was getting at Ron. The model shouldn't be disqualified outright for those problems, it should be scored lower in those categories. Total score should win. If there are ties, certain categories (like paint) could be given precedence in a tiebreaker. Again, that may be how models are already judged. I have never seen how shows are judged.

Looking forward to seeing those photos. You are doing this the right way....adopting from a rescue or shelter is great way to get the dog that is right for you.

I use spoons 15% larger and call it the Xingu method of checking paint compatibility.

Agree with this 100%. What are model judging standards? I have only been to one show, so have no real reference for this. Paint/finish should only be a percentage of the overall score, just like in 1:1 car show judging. 1:1 show judging has a group of judges that score every car (or every car in a group). I don't think that happens at model shows. I am OK with a shiny car, lacking in detail, winning "Fan Favorite" or something similar.

I think it is supposed to be the 350 Golden Commando with 2x4bbl, but mine is buried in my stash room, so not 100% sure.

I am working on a Fujimi/Testors Porsche 911 Turbo. There are 48 pieces to the engine assembly. There is a lot of detail (I am sure it isn't enough for some), but man this is a good amount of work for something that will not be seen that well when the model is complete. A good portion of the engine in the 1:1 reference photos I am using is hidden. Anyone else build a model and ask yourself why so much detail here and not near enough there? Ok, rant over.

Following along. Will have to see if those rear tires grow on me or not.

My gut tells me, that there will need to be a fair amount more surface prep when air brushing. The pens put out a fairly thick flow. The airbrush is going to atomize it and mist it on. It may be just as much work as Alclad. My airbrushing skills are not adequate enough for me to be the guinea pig, so I will wait for others to see what works. As to the cost.....we shell out a fair amount of money for BMF, different types of masking tapes, different types of paints we rarely use and all other sorts of tools and gadgets. If we have actually found something that gives us an adequate finish in a quicker and easier to use pen, I will fork over $12.