Can-Con

I was actually quite surprised at how close in size the rear bumpers are considering how much difference there is in the front ones.

That and the fact that Jairus Watson never did their box illustrations. ?

The AMT Rabbit [Golf MkI] is one of my favorite kits. I've built 2 and have 2 more in the stash. Underhood area is very fiddly though, no mounting points for the engine/tranny. That's definitely NOT the same kit that AMT reissued a couple years ago though. The reissue is a 1/24 Esci kit and this kit is originally AMT 1/25 and has only been issued that one time. If you need chassis or engine parts, the reissued AMT MkI Sirocco chassis and engine are identical to the ones in this kit.

I'm not a big fan of '57 Chevys like some people are, I can take them or leave them but I gotta say, I really like yours. That color works great on it.

No, I don't think he had much to do with that car, or any of the early cars that came out of the Barris shop. It was his brother, Sam that had all the talent. George was just a salesman,, "pitch man" if you will. That's why the early cars look so much better then the later cars built after Sam passed away. George also had a habit of buying cars built by other people, repainting them and making other minor changes and taking all the credit for the whole car instead of just the small and usually bad changes he made to them.

OK, I went and checked for you Mark. Although the front bumper of the Revell kit is about 1/8" wider than the old AMT kit front bumper, the rear Revell bumper is less than 1/16" wider. I also have a rear bumper from an AMT annual, which is different then the reissues and that's maybe only 1/32" different then the Revell piece. The only AMT '69 Chevelle I have unassembled is already converted to a Beaumont so I can't check on the tail lights. But in all honesty, I see no advantage in the AMT kit over the Revell. A lot of the time a new kit will have something that's "a bit off" making the older kit body look better or more accurate but aside from the easily fixed problem with the rear 1/4 panels, I don't see anything wrong with the Revell kit. [and I do like the old AMT kits]

I go every year, only missed the first one. Some of my pics on Fotki went missing years ago but here's a shot of the Beaumont at the show in 2006 behind my '58 Pontiac wagon.

All you need for the '68 to '72 Acadians is the photoetch sheet for the scripts. ,,as for a Beaumont ,, been there, done that.

Just checked mine, dated 1990.

Never seen one here in Canada either but I sure want one.?

Steve, could you at least tell us if it will have clear headlight lenses this time? I'm sure that's something we could probably figure out for our selves anyway when we see a pic of the front of the truck.

Steve, what's the blue on the right in your last pic? Looks very close to the color I want for a certain '68 GTO I've been wanting to build. I think it's "Meridian Turquois" but on the show it's always been referred to as just "blue" and looks different in different light.

I think the Model Car Garage PE sheet for the '65 Belvedere/Satellite should have the script you need.

Same here.

The original stock unibody car was destroyed in '87. The one in the fire was the tube-frame car which was rebuilt and ran 266.2 mph at the retired AFB in Limestone Maine in 2018

This one maybe? it's in the larger 1/20 scale and IIRC the body was molded in red.

Agreed, very nice. I doubt Scott knew the difference in the interior. Probably the guy who he got it from didn't know either. one of the reasons I notice this stuff is I was trained in auto upholstery years ago. Most people don't know or care. As long as it looks the part on the outside, that's "good enough".

Like if someone tried to sell a Chevy II gasser with a roof that looked slightly chopped no one would say anything, right? ?

Only that's not actually a '68 interior Luc, at least not those front seats. They look like '70 seats. The '68 seats , as all years GTO, have a unique sew pattern. The '68 are the ones in my pic below. I can take a pic of the years I have for comparison if anyone wants.

The '75 would get you really close for the front end, Gary. The only difference between it and the '74 is where the signal lights are. ,, now, the only other thing would be that back window.

As I've said in the attached thread, [with pics to illustrate the differences] not only is the dash different but the sew pattern on the seats and door panels is completely different also. The ONLY parts on the Monogram kit that are "68 are the front and rear bumpers and vent windows. If the manufacturer was to release this kit labeled as a "'68" today , they'd be ripped apart on all the message boards for not having a correct interior. That's probably why it hasen't been re-released in so long. Last time it was released was over 20 years ago.

If anyone really wants one all you need to do is get a Nova kit and the Model Car Garage set for the '68/'69 or '70/'71 Nova. Both have the appropriate scripts for an Acadian. It's all you need as Acadians were only rebadged Novas in those years. BTW, that's an "air box" not real.

Chevy Novas always were known as Chevy Novas in Canada. The Acadian was something extra we had to sell at the Pontiac dealers. "In addition to", NOT "instead of".

The rims on them are 23 mm outside diameter so about 21/22 inch. Not sure on the tires yet. I have some Pegasus ones that fit well but aren't very thick. I have some thoughts though. Might even get him to print out a taller set of tires for them. They were a gift and I didn't even know he was doing this for me I consider myself lucky to get them and have a good friend like that.

At least buddy knows he's making mistakes. Maybe a little more research is on order before someone does a comparo like this.