Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

vincen47

Members
  • Posts

    1,586
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by vincen47

  1. Nice job. This is what AMT should have done with the kit!
  2. I’ve seen pictures of this one before, too! What a neat project it’ll be. It’s right up my alley, as well. Go for it! I was wondering about engine access too. Like a front engine Class A RV, I bet they have a removable doghouse cover inside, and much of the exterior front opens up. If I remember correctly, the Argosy has a pretty large “hood” area surrounding the grille that opens/lifts away for general servicing and maintenance. Not as convenient as a conventional, or even a tilting cabover, but possible, much like a rear engine bus. Will the service techs be happy when this rolls in? Probably not. But I’m sure they’ll charge the added labor costs for the extra time. Turning radius? Big. But, probably no worse than many of the stretched conventional trucks, or a bus. And yeah, I know, you wouldn’t see a Greyhound pulling a 53’ race trailer, but some RVs and stackers come close. Now, the color question is answered. What about the cab? A resin A&N Freightliner Argosy is hard to find (I wish they’d make another run). Do you have one, or will you substitute another cabover?
  3. That’s neat. I figured you had at least a good start towards building the fleet. True, the lack of kit availability makes it more challenging. I continue to enjoy seeing your builds.
  4. Nice work, love the CN paint scheme. I haven’t seen a CN truck in person, but I see CN locomotives often. I agree that you don’t see these kits built up often on here, despite the popularity of the real thing. Full engine or not, I’d love to get my hands on a 670. I have a 780 in the stash that’s on my build list. I’ve considered opening and hinging the hood and fitting a resin ISX15 in it, but I haven’t researched how feasible that would be - if the frame could be adapted or if I’d need to put the cab and sleeper on a different chassis altogether.
  5. Fantastic all around, especially the ultra- realistic weathering. An incredible representation of the 1:1. About what percentage of your family’s fleet have you recreated in scale? At least one of every make and model?
  6. Great work on this one. Looks awesome with the dual axles, another example of what “should have been done” by the kit maker in the first place. Good proportions and balance, certainly looks the part.
  7. That’s a classy looking rig, great color choices. Looks great with the flatbed, and I really like the black on that. Nice all around, great build. And like others have said, lowering it a little made a big difference.
  8. Thanks JT! Thanks! I sure hope the rest of the build goes smoothly. I always have to remind myself to take my time, and not rush things.
  9. Here’s an update. Sometimes you don’t notice things until you look at photos, it seems. I did some needed touch-up painting. I added the lifting brackets to the front and rear of the block. I wasn’t happy with the valve covers, so I refinished those, and they look much better now. This time I did the Molotow first, then added the black. Thanks for looking!
  10. Beautiful build, and now a fitting tribute to your good friend. That makes it even better.
  11. This will be great. I loved what you did with the last dump truck you built.
  12. Wow, almost one new (at least cab) kit per year in the 90’s. Good info. I think the WS Constellation followed in ‘98 or so, too. Even with some having duplicate chassis/engines (something that can be corrected, for the most part, if the builder finds it necessary) - I wish they hadn’t stopped that yearly trend of new North American trucks. Granted, I’m sure some would have huge issues like the Superliner, but others may have been home runs, especially if they tooled up another engine and chassis like they did with the Peterbilts.
  13. That’s a nice looking truck, especially in that beautiful snowy mountain photo. When this first posted, I got the impression that the engine came with it. Not a total deal breaker, but the engine is one of those things I always prefer, if possible, so that’ll increase the cost, and the consideration. That being said, it still looks like a great kit, and like others have said, you get what you pay for - a quality, highly detailed and accurate model of a unique subject matter not available elsewhere.
  14. That’s an impressive build. It’s great to see it finished. Takes up a lot of real estate, that’s for sure, but looks good doing it - that’s the important part.
  15. This really shows the potential in that kit. Not just for beginners. It can be made into something special like this. Great work.
  16. Looks great. I like that C&NW yellow. I think I like that better than UP yellow, but that would have worked too. I like that single horn in the center. Looks right at home in those outdoor shots.
  17. Lowering the headlights is a huge improvement in itself, not to mention the other things you’ve added and swapped.
  18. Nice and clean. Love the green!
  19. Yes, it’s just a difference in displacement. Externally, the 3406E, C-15, C15 Acert and C16 are dimensionally the same, and share most of the exterior components, with subtle differences in details like the valve cover logos. Like the C-15, the C15 Acert is 15.2l, but has twin turbos as it’s biggest spotting feature. The Acert also shares the block with the Maxxforce 15, but the similarities end there. Jamie sells the Acert, and also has the 3406E and C-15 single turbo. So, there’s a lot of flexibility in our modeling world in what we put in our trucks. Especially being how this era of engines are 10-20 years old and many of them have been modified over the years with many parts interchangeable between models. The C12 is a different block, though, and the valve covers are different. KFS has a C13 if you’re looking for something in that range. Thanks!
  20. Though it’s not part of a completed truck build yet, I think an engine can be a model in itself. I’ve started my next truck conversion, a 1/24th scale black and chrome Peterbilt 379, and I’ve built a Cat 3406E for it's power. The resin engine is from Moluminum. It wears real Cat yellow, and includes several scratch-built extras. Further detailing will be added when it’s in-frame. While most of Caterpillar’s 3406 line was 14.6L, It represents a ‘99 15.8l E-Model 3406. Factory rated at 600 horsepower (and often up-rated higher), the final generation of these 964 cubic inch beasts were the precursor to the C16. This one has been remanufactured and up-fitted with chrome and ceramic parts, to boost the performance and style. It’s representative of the custom engines from diesel shops that outfit gliders and other owner-operator rigs. Big Cats like this are highly sought-after for their power and pre-emissions reliability. They often find a second life in a glider or show truck. it’s coupled to an 18 speed Eaton Autoshift transmission that’s been up-fitted with a trans oil cooler. The build was detailed using Ken Smith’s Car Modeller 3406E article and online photos for reference and inspiration, many from Kustom Truck, an Oregon-based glider and diesel shop. I hope you’ve enjoyed it. Next step is the rolling chassis.
  21. I was wondering about that. I bet you’re correct. Thanks, good to know. I would have been disappointed if I grabbed one thinking I could build it stock.
×
×
  • Create New...